Analysis

Should animal abusers be treated like sex offenders?

Just like child molesters, animal abusers in one New York county will have to register so their neighbors know who they are

Suffolk County, N.Y., has become the first local government in the nation to launch an animal abuser registry, and New York state itself is considering a bill that would require sheriffs in every county to notify anyone living within a half mile of a convicted animal abuser. Should such a system be implemented nationwide, or have animal-rights activists gone overboard? Here, a brief guide:

How do animal abuse registries work?
They're similar to registries for sex offenders, although not identical. Suffolk County plans to post convicted animal abusers' names, addresses, and photographs online. Pet stores, breeders, and animal shelters will have to check the registry and refuse to let anyone on it buy or adopt a pet. Everyone who has been convicted of a crime such as animal torture or aggravated cruelty to animals will be required to sign up, and their names will remain on the list for five years. The County's definition of "animal abuse" also includes animal fighting, failing to feed pets, abandoning animals, and harming a service animal.

Is this just meant to shame abusers?
That's part of it. Public shame has long helped discourage crime, from days when Puritans used stocks to punish colonial criminals to more recent efforts to combat prostitution by publishing photos of prostitutes' "johns" in newspapers. But beyond the shame factor, the Animal Legal Defense Fund says nationwide registries would stop abusers from sidestepping court orders preventing them from owning an animal by simply moving to another county or state.

Are these registries likely to become common?
Three New York counties have adopted them — Suffolk is just the first to implement one. And New York lawmakers aren't the only ones considering a statewide registry. Similar legislation has been proposed in 25 other states, including New Jersey, Connecticut, California, Texas, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Maryland.

Is this really necessary?
Critics say animal abuse registries will waste the time of local law enforcement officers, time better spent protecting humans from criminals. But supporters say reining in animal abusers also keeps people safe, because studies indicate that people who hurt animals are five times more likely than others to go on to harm humans. "There's a strong correlation between people who abuse animals and [those who] graduate to abusing people," says Michigan state Rep. Harvey Santana (D-Detroit), who has proposed a registry in his state.

Sources: Bloomberg BusinessWeek, Care2, Watertown Daily Times

Recommended

6 outstanding homes built in the 1940s
House
Feature

6 outstanding homes built in the 1940s

The Check-In: 2022's best and worst airports, and more
Airplanes.
Feature

The Check-In: 2022's best and worst airports, and more

The Week contest: Walker robber
A man with a walker.
Feature

The Week contest: Walker robber

Is plant-based meat a failure?
A plantburger.
Briefing

Is plant-based meat a failure?

Most Popular

How low will gas prices go this winter? 3 analyst predictions.
person using gas pump photo
How low can they go?

How low will gas prices go this winter? 3 analyst predictions.

439 Texas churches split from United Methodist Church in widening schism
United Methodist Church
Breaking up is hard to do

439 Texas churches split from United Methodist Church in widening schism

If China invades Taiwan
Xi Jinping.
Briefing

If China invades Taiwan