Trayvon Martin: Does George Zimmerman's side of the story change anything?

The neighborhood watch volunteer says he shot Martin because the teenager was beating him up. If that's true, should Zimmerman be in the clear?

Protesters, some carrying petitions in support of slain teen Trayvon Martin, protest in D.C.: Shooter George Zimmerman claims that it was Trayvon who attacked him.
(Image credit: Roberto Gonzalez/Getty Images)

Protesters gathered in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday to demand a hate-crime investigation into the killing of Trayvon Martin, a black teen who was shot last month by a half-Latino neighborhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman. Police in Sanford, Fla., the town where Martin was killed, say Zimmerman told them the shooting occurred after Martin punched him in the nose and banged his head against the ground. Martin's parents say the account is just part of an attempt to smear their son and deflect blame. Does Zimmerman's side of the story suggest the tragedy wasn't his fault?

Zimmerman still belongs in jail: Let's assume everything happened as Zimmerman claims, says Robert Wright at The Atlantic. Zimmerman shot Martin because the teen was beating him up, and Zimmerman feared for his life. But how did they get to that point? "A man with a gun pursued an unarmed teenager who had done nothing wrong" and started a confrontation that ended in the young man's death. Zimmerman still "should do jail time for killing Martin."

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up