Is the Army to blame for the Afghan massacre?

The soldier accused of gunning down 16 Afghan civilians could face the death penalty if convicted. Should his superiors be held accountable, too?

Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta speaks with Lieutenant General Curtis Scaparrotti during his visit in Kabul
(Image credit: REUTERS/Scott Olson)

The U.S. military is facing "unprecedented strains" in Afghanistan in the wake of Sunday's massacre of 17 Afghan villagers, including 9 children, allegedly at the hands of a disturbed American soldier who was on his fourth tour of duty in a decade and had previously suffered a traumatic brain injury. Afghan President Hamid Karzai has demanded that NATO pull all foreign troops out of outposts in remote villages, and return them to their bases. The Obama administration is promising justice, and the military might bring capital murder charges against the unnamed suspect. But even if he's found guilty, and acted alone, do his superiors share some of the blame for deploying a damaged, war-weary soldier?

Blame the generals: "If the allegations prove true," nothing can absolve the soldier" of his responsibility for this "cold blooded murder," says Jim Frederick at TIME. But military commanders have to answer for this "atrocity," too. If the soldier's superiors missed "red flags" — the traumatic brain injury that the soldier suffered in Iraq might have affected his behavior — they must be held accountable if we're to have any chance of preventing the next tragedy.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up