Getting more by working less
A shorter workweek would produce happier, healthier workers and put many of the unemployed back to work, said Richard Schiffman at The Washington Post.
Richard Schiffman
The Washington Post
We shouldn’t have to “kill ourselves at work just to make a living,” said Richard Schiffman. Too many Americans are sacrificing their sleep, health, and happiness for their jobs. We plug away late at night and on weekends, working hundreds of hours more each year than people in other developed countries.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yet even as corporate profitability continues to soar, the buying power of our wages is on the decline. Someone is getting rich off our productivity, “but it is not the American worker.” That’s why it’s time we consider “a wide-scale reduction in work hours.” This may seem an odd moment to do so, given the weak economy. But it may be just what we need to stop corporations from prioritizing profits above the health of the economy and of “those whose hard work made that economy flourish.”
A shorter workweek would produce happier, healthier workers and put many of the unemployed back to work. Some paychecks might be smaller, but that’s a trade-off plenty of Americans have said they’re willing to make for more leisure time with their families. “With so much to gain,” we would be wise to do a little less.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How Tesla has put Elon Musk on track to be the world’s first trillionaireIn The Spotlight The package agreed by the Tesla board outlines several key milestones over a 10-year period
-
Cop30: is the UN climate summit over before it begins?Today’s Big Question Trump administration will not send any high-level representatives, while most nations failed to submit updated plans for cutting greenhouse gas emissions
-
‘The Big Crunch’: why science is divided over the future of the universeThe Explainer New study upends the prevailing theory about dark matter and says it is weakening
-
Mall rats don’t foster prosperity
feature Our promotion of consumption “as the key to health and wealth” has whittled the savings rate from an average of 9.6 percent in the 1970s to 3.3 percent in the 2000s, said Caroline Baum at Bloomberg.com.
-
Consumer debt is not to blame
feature Given the circumstances, in fact, consumer spending is pretty consistent and pretty healthy, said James Surowiecki at The New Yorker.