Exhibit of the week: Zoe Strauss: Ten Years

The Philadelphia Museum of Art has mounted a midcareer retrospective of Strauss's photographs of South Philly.

Philadelphia Museum of Art

Through April 22

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Clearly, the 41-year-old Strauss “has accomplished more in the past decade than many artists do in a lifetime,” said Karen Rosenberg in The New York Times. In her portraiture, strangers bear their wounds—black eyes, gunshot injuries, a hysterectomy scar—with an honesty that’s ennobling. Her subjects’ damaged bodies meanwhile “come to seem inseparable from the graffitied walls, scratched windows, and stained pavement” in her photographs of neighborhood architecture. Though she’s taken her compassionate eye to other cities, she’s best on her home turf: buttonholing new subjects outside the local bodegas, catching kids doing flips off decrepit mattresses tossed onto the street. At the museum, the 170 prints on display can seem too much of a good thing—the exhibit has a cramped feel. Luckily, you can catch the full power of her images out on the streets.

The billboards are the perfect medium for an artist dedicated to bringing art to new audiences, said John Vettese in the Philadelphia City Paper. At 10th and Reed, Antoinette Conti (2001), a loving portrait of a stern neighborhood matriarch, “keeps a watchful eye over the intersection.” Near 30th Street stands an image of decaying homes at the site of a deadly 1985 confrontation between a radical group and city police. Especially at the museum, where images depicting wounds and substance abuse are more prevalent, there’s “an undeniable element of shock” to Strauss’s work. But “if that’s all there was, her art would not be so revered.” Her connection to her subjects allows certain images to emit “a tone of wonderment.” In fact, some of Strauss’s everyday people are “rendered glamorous” by her lens.