Directed by Bill Condon
(PG-13)
**
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
This fourth installment in the Twilight vampire franchise is saved from “pure lousiness” by a “flash or two of real filmmaking,” said Michael Phillips in the Chicago Tribune. But it’s “the dullest movie of the bunch”—even though it finally lets Kristen Stewart’s chaste maiden and Robert Pattinson’s “fwoopy-haired” vampire go to bed together. The sex occurs after marriage, of course, and results in a pregnancy that initiates a debate about aborting the couple’s apparently demonic spawn. The Twilight novels at least felt highly personal—their “sludgy mix of cautionary tale and wish fulfillment” felt like the author’s own yearnings, said Wesley Morris in The Boston Globe. But the movies have grown increasingly mechanical, and this one’s “deplorable special effects” suggest that director Bill Condon wanted to veer into full camp but lost his nerve. Still, there’s no denying the film’s power as a pop-culture phenomenon, said Stephanie Zacharek in Movieline
.com. The whole point of the Twilight movies is the “anticipation leading up to each one.” With one installment to go, Condon still has a chance to end the series with a bang.
How military service works for K-pop idols
The Week contest: Flight fraud
Is Trump sidelining Congress' war powers?
