Banning banker bonuses
No one employed by a company that “would require a taxpayer-financed bailout if it failed” should ever get a bonus, period, said Nassim Nicholas Taleb at The New York Times.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
The New York Times
There’s one way to stop bankers from taking “risks that threaten the general public,” said Nassim Nicholas Taleb. “Eliminate bonuses.” No one employed by a company that “would require a taxpayer-financed bailout if it failed” should ever get a bonus, period. We need such a rule because bonuses give bankers a no-lose incentive to “game the system” instead of judging risk responsibly. We don’t lavish bonuses on our soldiers, who receive “promotions and the honor of a job well done if they succeed” and shame if they fail. By contrast, bankers receive big bonuses for short-term profits and bailouts for failure.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Nearly 4,000 years ago, the Babylonians realized that such “upside-without-downside” reward systems lead to trouble. They enforced “the best risk-management rule ever,” declaring a builder could be put to death if he built a shoddy dwelling. By making it unattractive for builders to cut corners and fool inspectors, the Babylonians got stronger houses. To achieve more stability in our financial system, we don’t need such a draconian threat. One basic rule would suffice: “Bonuses and bailouts should never mix.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Parthenogenesis: the miracle of 'virgin births' in the animal kingdom
The Explainer Asexual reproduction, in which females reproduce without males by cloning themselves, has been documented in multiple species
-
What will bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table?
Today's Big Question With diplomatic efforts stalling, the US and EU turn again to sanctions as Russian drone strikes on Poland risk dramatically escalating conflict
-
Why social media is obsessed with cortisol
In The Spotlight Wellness trend is the latest response to an increasingly maligned hormone
-
Issue of the week: Car dealers’ showdown with Tesla
feature Tesla's direct-sale business model is coming under fire in New Jersey and many other states.
-
Issue of the week: Has Washington defeated Wall Street?
feature The Dodd-Frank Act forced banks to sell off “many of their classic ‘Wall Street’ businesses. How are the banks doing?
-
Issue of the week: Is 2014 the recovery year?
feature Economic forecasters generally think 2014 will “be a breakout year” for the U.S. economy.
-
Issue of the week: Signs of a true recovery
feature Could the economy finally be back on track?
-
Issue of the week: The economy’s new normal
feature Are we in “a permanent slump?”
-
Issue of the week: When is inflation just right?
feature Though it has been battled in past decades, some economists believe a little inflation is good for a weak economy.
-
Issue of the week: The rise of a part-time economy
feature The economy has created new jobs for the 34th month in a row, but most of them are low-paid and part-time.
-
Issue of the week: A disappointing jobs report
feature The economy added just 88,000 jobs in March, less than half of Wall Street’s expectations.