Talking to the Taliban
Has the death of Osama bin Laden and the rumored death of Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Oma given NATO some leverage?
Does NATO finally have the Taliban on the ropes? asked the Kabul Hasht-e Sobh in an editorial. At a recent news conference with President Hamid Karzai, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen gave the Taliban an ultimatum, telling them the time had come to lay down their arms, cut ties to terrorists, and pledge to support the constitution. “If you continue on the road of violence, you will find no victory, only defeat,” Rasmussen said. His firm tone was inspiring—and encouraging. It’s the first time a Western official has spoken “from the position of power,” instead of “imploring and appeasing” the Taliban. It looks like the death of Osama bin Laden, coupled with the recent disappearance and rumored death of Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar, has “put the Taliban in Afghanistan in a delicate and difficult situation.” Finally, rather than cajoling the militants and calling them “brothers,” as Karzai has been apt to do, Afghan leaders and their Western allies can lay down the law.
Don’t be so sure, said Sayed Makarem in Arman-e Melli. According to local and international media reports, the Americans have “apparently initiated their own secret talks with Taliban leaders.” These negotiations make a mockery of the Afghan peace process, which is supposed to be overseen by our own High Peace Council. Are the Westerners cutting a side deal, telling the Taliban “that they are willing to share power”? Such an agreement “will never be acceptable to the Afghans, especially the new generation.” We have suffered so much over so many years, and we won’t allow those losses to be in vain. “Afghans believe it is better to die rather than live a life dominated by oppression.”
Yet the Afghan people are also tired of war, said Anis. After three decades of bloodshed, many of us would “welcome our former opponents into the peace process.” Wouldn’t it be a relief to live without the fear of “suicide bombers who come to our country to kill innocent civilians”? Can we imagine a life in which “no hospitals or schools are burned down”?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The problem is that the Taliban isn’t the only group killing innocent civilians, said Weesa. With their indiscriminate airstrikes, U.S. forces rain down death on our weddings and celebrations, and obliterate private homes in the night as families are sleeping. Afghan officials are trying to negotiate a strategic cooperation treaty that would require U.S. forces to limit their activities and be accountable to the Afghan government. But the U.S. “wants its forces to act as they please, as they have been doing in the past.” The people of Afghanistan “will never accept or tolerate” such a deal. Foreign military forces “are responsible for most of the suffering inflicted on the people in the past 10 years.” They must be held accountable.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How AI is offering journalists protection from persecution in Venezuela
Under the Radar Media organisations launch news show hosted by AI-generated avatars to 'shelter their real-life journalists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Today's political cartoons - November 17, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - Trump turkey, melting media, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 contentious cartoons about Matt Gaetz's AG nomination
Cartoons Artists take on ethical uncertainty, offensive justice, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Saudis want action on Syria
feature The Syrian conflict “has tested the Saudi-U.S. pact as never before.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
NSA spy scandal divides Europe
feature Spy agencies are supposed to protect their nations’ interests, but with this scandal the NSA has only harmed them.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Any takers for a war on Syria?
feature Despite David Cameron’s pleas, the British Parliament says no to Syria, while François Hollande, in a surprise move, provides French backing.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Turkey wants our help with Syria
feature Turkey can’t take any more—it’s time to tell our closest ally, the U.S., that “it is past time to do something.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Afghans worry about U.S. pullout
feature Is an internal meltdown all but inevitable after the U.S. withdraws its troops?
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The world’s biggest free-trade zone
feature An “economic NATO” has been proposed before, but President Obama is the first leader to give it such an unequivocal endorsement.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Should Canada keep U.S. deserters?
feature Last week, Canada for the first time deported a female Iraq War resister.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Calling the Haqqanis terrorists
feature After two years of “spirited debate,” the U.S. has declared the Haqqani network a terrorist group.
By The Week Staff Last updated