Syria sanctions: Will they work?

After two months of protests and brutal repression in Syria, the U.S. (finally) targets embattled leader Bashar Al-Assad's personal finances 

Syrian protester living in Jordan: The Obama administration linked President Bashar al-Assad explicitly to human rights abuses during the crackdown that killed 900 demonstrators.
(Image credit: REUTERS/Muhammad Hamed)

The Obama administration is imposing financial sanctions that, for the first time, target Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad personally. The U.S. hopes to increase pressure on his regime, after a bloody crackdown that has killed more than 900 pro-democracy protesters. The economic measures against Assad and six other top officials are mostly symbolic — Assad probably doesn't have many assets in the U.S. to freeze. But the move marks a shift for the administration, which insisted Assad was a reformer, even after the violence began. Now, America has linked the embattled leader to human rights abuses. Will that about face do any good?

No, this is way too little, way too late: Too bad Obama didn't target Assad's wallet two months ago, says The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. Sanctions are almost always symbolic, but this gesture might have had real, positive impact if we had done it "when the demonstrations had momentum and before the regime had consolidated its grip." Now, the moment has passed. "As with sanctions on Iran and the intervention in Libya, Obama seems to have come to the right conclusion only after the moment when American leadership could have done the most good."

"The Assad sanction"

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Actually, sanctions could help: "It remains to be seen how punishing sanctions will be," say Steven Lee Myers and Anthony Shadid in The New York Times, "but coordinated sanctions by the United States and Europe could have an economic bite." Similar sanctions against Libya's Moammar Gadhafi have resulted in the seizure of $36 billion in assets. And don't forget the political impact. This is the kind of direct punch "officials in Syria seem genuinely to fear."

"U.S. imposes sanctions on Syrian leader and 6 aides"

Hopefully, this is only a start: The sanctions against Assad "are useful, but not enough," says Michael Young at CNN. The U.S. must muster a broad international coalition, including Russia and China, to stand up and say that Assad has lost all legitimacy, and that it's time to let Syrians determine their own fate. "Obama has to take the lead in showing Assad the door."

"Sanctions aren't enough; Assad must go"