Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo

Rajiv Joseph’s Pulitzer-nominated play is about an introspective tiger whose ghost roams Baghdad after being shot at the city’s zoo by a U.S. soldier.

Richard Rodgers Theater

New York

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

***

“The most original drama written about the Iraq war” won’t be found in any art-house cinema, said Charles McNulty in the Los Angeles Times. Risk-averse Broadway isn’t the first place anyone would look to find a daring, surreal story about an introspective tiger whose ghost roams a shattered Baghdad after being shot in its cage at the city’s zoo. But sometime after the 2009 debut of Rajiv Joseph’s Pulitzer-nominated play, actor Robin Williams began championing it. Stepping into the title role for the production’s move from L.A. to New York, the veteran movie star plays the tiger in Iraqi street clothes and a woolly beard, and proves once again that he can “adapt his manic gifts” to new challenges. He anchors a show that will “challenge mainstream theatergoers” and leave many “profoundly moved.”

At least a few will simply be put off, said Terry Teachout in The Wall Street Journal. While Joseph’s premise is “clever enough,” he’s created a world in which invading U.S. soldiers are no better than the despotic regime they’re fighting. From the opening scene, in which a “loutishly stupid” Marine shoots the tiger after it bites off the hand of his corrupt colleague, we’re in a world in which “everyone is no damn good.” One would think that special condemnation would be reserved for Saddam Hussein’s son Uday, who’s portrayed here before his death as a man who “tortures and kills because he feels like it.” But no: Uday’s former gardener, Musa, steps forward to tell us explicitly that his new American employers are just as tyrannical.

But Tiger really isn’t a “civics-lesson kind of a play,” said Charles Isherwood in The New York Times. “Man and beast are depicted throughout with a fanciful humor” that still allows us to see the ways war brings out our “baser instincts.” Williams, though “quite funny,” emerges as the play’s conscience, trying at one point to atone for his “tigerness” as he worries that his very nature may be immoral. This “visionary” play does win some laughs. But unlike most Broadway fare, it also “asks us to think and feel like adults.”