Do we really need a 19th 'Jane Eyre' movie?
Yet another big screen adapatation of Charlotte Brontë's classic novel hits theatres, and critics can't help but wonder if we've had enough of Jane already
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Charlotte Brontë's beloved gothic novel Jane Eyre has been adapted 18 times for the big screen, and another nine times for TV movies. The 19th feature film version of Brontë's classic about a spunky, plain governess hits theaters this weekend, starring Mia Wasikowska (Alice in Wonderland, The Kids Are All Right) and Michael Fassbender (Inglourious Basterds), and directed by Cary Fukunaga (Sin Nombre). Do we really need yet another Jane Eyre flick? (Watch a clip from the film)
Yes, Mia Wasikowska makes it worthwhile: "Oh, no, you might say, not another Jane Eyre!" says David Edelstein at New York. Yes, "the damn thing pops up every decade," and it does seem "pretty well tapped out" at this point. But this new version is "worth seeing for Wasikowska, an actress so young yet so formed" that she's "hands down my favorite plain Jane."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Plus, the filmmakers brought new life to a classic: "Is anything fresh even possible?" asks Peter Travers at Rolling Stone. The answer, with this new film, is a resounding yes. Director Cary Fukunaga has "deftly brought out Brontë's gothic terrors," and "reanimated a classic for a new generation, letting Jane Eyre resonate with terror and tenderness."
And, all those other versions were lacking: "There has never been a definitive movie Jane Eyre," says A.O. Scott in The New York Times. There has also "never been a truly rotten one," and "even the sentimental 1996 Franco Zeffirelli version, with William Hurt embarrassingly miscast as a Rochester more nearly a mild eccentric than a brooding, Byronic type, has its moments." Maybe it's just Jane's fate to live in movie mediocrity.
"Another Hike on the Moors for Jane Eyre"
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Not sure we needed this: Fans of the books are unlikely to be impressed by this latest version, says Elizabeth Weitzman in the Daily News. Sure, Wasikowska is an asset, but there's no chemistry between her and Fassbender's Rochester, and Fukunaga doesn't get the novel's gothic tone right. While the dirctor has "deftly" brought some modern elements to the story, the "emotional swoons" every Jane Eyre adaptation should deliver are missing here.
-
Film reviews: ‘Send Help’ and ‘Private Life’Feature An office doormat is stranded alone with her awful boss and a frazzled therapist turns amateur murder investigator
-
Movies to watch in Februarythe week recommends Time travelers, multiverse hoppers and an Iraqi parable highlight this month’s offerings during the depths of winter
-
ICE’s facial scanning is the tip of the surveillance icebergIN THE SPOTLIGHT Federal troops are increasingly turning to high-tech tracking tools that push the boundaries of personal privacy