Health & Science

The bread that cavemen ate; The sound of tasteless food; Wiping out a viral disease; The anti-alcoholism gene

The bread that cavemen ate

Anthropologists have long believed that our caveman ancestors survived mostly on meat. But a new analysis of Stone Age tools suggests that early modern humans ate ground flour as long as 28,000 years ago—some 20,000 years before the dawn of farming. The study examined grinding stones found at ancient settlement sites in Russia, Italy, and the Czech Republic. The flour came not from wheat or barley but from the ground-up roots of cattails and ferns, which are rich in starch and were likely peeled and dried first. Adding water would have created a dough that might have been added to soup or cooked as an unleavened flatbread. Meat certainly was a major part of the Paleolithic diet, with early humans spending much of their time hunting. The preparation of flour and vegetables left behind less durable evidence for anthropologists to find—until now. “It’s another nail in the coffin of the idea that hunter-gatherers didn’t use plants for food,” Ofer Bar-Yosef, a Harvard archaeologist not involved in the study, tells NatureNews.com. The researchers went so far as to replicate the recipe. “You make a kind of pita and cook it on the hot stone,” says Laura Longo of the Italian Institute of Prehistory and Early History. The result, Longo says, was “crispy like a cracker but not very tasty.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Wiping out a viral disease

For thousands of years, an infectious disease called rinderpest plagued the world’s cattle, killing up to 80 percent of the domesticated cows, water buffalo, and yaks it encountered. Now it’s gone—only the second viral disease in history to be eradicated, following smallpox’s exit in 1980. “This is something the entire global community can be proud of,” U.S. Department of Agriculture animal-disease expert William R. White tells The New York Times. “Rinderpest has caused almost unimaginable misery for a very long time.” Victory was hard-won; the first successful vaccine was developed in the 1950s, and in 1994 the United Nations launched a worldwide effort to track and contain outbreaks. But U.N. monitors haven’t seen a single case since 2001, in Kenya. “It is probably the most remarkable achievement in the history of veterinary science,” says Peter Roeder, a long-time veterinarian with the U.N.’s Global Rinderpest Eradication Program. Officials are now considering how many lab samples of rinderpest to keep on hand around the world, for research or just in case the disease reappears and a new vaccine is needed.

The anti-alcoholism gene

Ten percent to 20 percent of the population has a gene that makes them get drunk easily—and therefore makes them far less susceptible to alcoholism, a new study has found. In a study of about 230 people who have at least one alcoholic parent, researchers at the University of North Carolina identified a gene variant that makes some people’s brains more sensitive to alcohol. When given the equivalent of three drinks, people with the variant reported feeling very tipsy, and their posture and gait betrayed that they were drunk. The gene has “a big, big effect” on how people respond to booze, study leader Kirk Wilhelmsen tells USA Today. The 10 percent to 20 percent of the population that carry the gene variant tend to avoid drinking frequently or in great quantity, because they can’t “hold their liquor’’; as a result, they are less likely to become alcoholics in the long run. The discovery offers the hope of a treatment for alcoholism, if scientists can develop a way to tweak the gene or mimic its effects, Wilhelmsen says. “My expectation is this is actually going to lead somewhere.”