Given President Obama’s pro-Palestinian bias, we can’t expect much from the Mideast peace talks launched last week, said Moshe Dann in Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth. “No matter what Arab terrorists do,” Obama supports the Palestinian Authority. When Palestinian terrorists murdered four Israelis last week, Obama viewed the attack as an attempt to undermine the talks. But Palestinians attack Israelis week in and week out, talks or no talks. “Framing this attack as politically motivated distorts the nature and meaning of Arab terrorism against Jews.” It’s about hatred and anti-Semitism, not politics. But Obama refuses to see that. With him, the Palestinian Authority “can get away with murder—and does.”
Obama actually believes that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas wants peace, said The Jerusalem Post in an editorial. Abbas may be “far better intentioned than his malevolent predecessor, Yasser Arafat,” but his Fatah faction still routinely demonizes Israel and opposes its very existence. Under his rule, Palestinian terrorists are given state honors. The Ramallah street that houses the Palestinian Authority’s new presidential compound, for example, was named for Palestinian “arch-terrorist” Yihye Ayash, the bomb expert who devoted himself to sabotaging the Oslo peace process. The “glorification of ‘heroic’ terrorists, ‘martyred’ in the cause of murdering Israelis,” is a state project in Gaza and the West Bank alike. Until Abbas takes real steps toward changing that poisonous climate, he can’t be considered a peace partner.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
China looms large over India and Pakistan's latest violenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT Beijing may not have had troops on the ground, but as South Asia's two nuclear powers bared their teeth over Kashmir, China eyed opportunity in its own backyard
-
Where the new Pope Leo XIV stands on various issuesThe Explainer The first American pontiff is expected to continue some of his predecessor's work
-
What's wrong with America's air traffic control systems?Today's Big Question The radios and radar keep going out at Newark International
-
No equipment for Afghanistanfeature The U.S. has reportedly decided to hand over to Pakistan some $7 billion worth of American military hardware currently in Afghanistan.
-
How they see us: Crudely insulting our allies
feature Well, at least we know now what the Americans really think of us.
-
Spied-upon Germans are not mollified
feature In the wake of revelations last year about the NSA's spying activities, relations between Germany and the U.S. have been at an all-time low.
-
Is a deal with the U.S. in Iran’s interest?
feature The “unprecedented enthusiasm” of Western diplomats after the talks in Geneva suggests they received unexpected concessions from the Iranians.
-
How they see us: Sowing chaos in Libya
feature The kidnapping of Abu Anas al-Libi is an outrage committed against Libyan sovereignty—and it will have repercussions.
-
Europe is complicit in spying
feature It’s not just the Americans who have developed a gigantic spying apparatus.
-
Protecting Snowden
feature American whistle-blower Edward Snowden has proved a master spy with his “meticulously timed operation.”
-
Listening in on Europeans
feature Europeans are apoplectic over the U.S. National Security Agency's massive PRISM surveillance program.