Dinner for Schmucks
In this English-language adaptation of the French farce, The Dinner Game, a businessman will lose a promotion unless he brings an idiot to dinner.
Directed by Jay Roach
(PG-13)
**
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.
Dinner for Schmucks isn’t “a remake but a stupidization of a very good French farce,” said Michael Phillips in the Chicago Tribune. Francis Veber’s The Dinner Game was a smart, mean-spirited black comedy about businessmen who invite idiots to dinner and ridicule them for sport. The film was “dry yet sharp, skating a fine line between embracing the humiliation of its premise and exposing the cruelty of its proponents.” Jay Roach’s English-language adaptation softens the edges to keep from offending American audiences and winds up feeling slapstick and stagey. Paul Rudd plays an executive who can only win a promotion if he brings the biggest loser he can find (Steve Carell) to a dinner, said Genevieve Koski in the A.V. Club. Thanks to the actors’ “dependable likability,” Dinner for Schmucks has some appeal, even if its “laughs are more silly than scathing.” This is a rare film that’s actually “funnier than the trailers” suggest, said Ty Burr in The Boston Globe. Though the characters occasionally annoy, the film “suckers you into an agreeable state of idiot bliss” for its 114 minutes.
A free daily email with the day’s biggest news and analysis – and the best features from TheWeek.com