Demonizing BP and the British, too
Whither BP and the "special relationship"?
President Obama is out to destroy BP, said James Delingpole in the Daily Express. Ever since April 20, when the oil company’s Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, killing 11 people and sending a seemingly unstoppable gush of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. president has been on “an anti-Limey crusade.” He insists on referring to BP as British Petroleum—a name the company hasn’t used in many years. And he has even aimed “schoolboy threats” to “kick the ass” of the party at fault, by which he means, of course, BP’s British chief executive, Tony Hayward. Now Obama wants to slap an injunction on BP to prevent it from paying dividends to shareholders until it has paid off all American damage claims. Disastrously for Britain, all that “hysterical posturing and cynical grandstanding” has done real damage: BP’s share price has plummeted more than 40 percent.
And that means British pensioners will suffer, said Mark Austin in the Sunday Mirror. Millions of people’s pension funds are heavily invested in BP stock—so as the share price falls, those funds evaporate. The British government will have to take action to stop the slide. After all, “bankrupting BP benefits no one.” Least of all Americans, said The Times in an editorial. BP employs more workers in the U.S. than it does in Britain, so if the company is forced to lay people off, Americans will lose their jobs. Then, too, there’s the Gulf cleanup and compensation to think of: If BP’s market capitalization contracts, it won’t be able to get its hands on the vast funds Obama wants it to provide to the Gulf Coast states. We all know BP is responsible for the spill. But “it makes neither environmental nor economic sense to weaken the company further by issuing threats and fines.”
Obama is simply trying to turn his countrymen against someone besides himself, said Simon Heffer in the Daily Telegraph. Faced with a burgeoning economic crisis and the near-certain defeat of his party in the midterm elections, the president is looking utterly impotent. So he is “lashing out,” in what prominent Tory Lord Tebbitt has called “a crude, bigoted, xenophobic display of partisan political presidential petulance.” The U.S. president has irrevocably marred the “special relationship” between our countries with his “coarse, infantile, and aggressive behavior.” At this point, Prime Minister David Cameron should stand up for British business and tell Obama to “shut up.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
If this oil slick smothers the “special relationship” it won’t be the Americans’ fault, said Rupert Cornwell in the Independent. It will be ours, for taking the U.S. response so personally. Yes, Obama—and his fellow Americans—are furious about the spill. But they’re mad at BP, not at Britain. “The reaction would have been similar had ExxonMobil, Chevron, or some other U.S. company been responsible for the spill.” Of course, that’s no consolation for BP. It is finding that “hell has few furies quite like sanctimonious American outrage.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - September 7, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - football widows, meddling kids, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Smoking ban: the return of the nanny state?
Talking Point Starmer's plan to revive Sunak-era war on tobacco has struck an unsettling chord even with some non-smokers
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: September 7, 2024
The Week's daily crossword puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
No equipment for Afghanistan
feature The U.S. has reportedly decided to hand over to Pakistan some $7 billion worth of American military hardware currently in Afghanistan.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Crudely insulting our allies
feature Well, at least we know now what the Americans really think of us.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Spied-upon Germans are not mollified
feature In the wake of revelations last year about the NSA's spying activities, relations between Germany and the U.S. have been at an all-time low.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Is a deal with the U.S. in Iran’s interest?
feature The “unprecedented enthusiasm” of Western diplomats after the talks in Geneva suggests they received unexpected concessions from the Iranians.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Sowing chaos in Libya
feature The kidnapping of Abu Anas al-Libi is an outrage committed against Libyan sovereignty—and it will have repercussions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Europe is complicit in spying
feature It’s not just the Americans who have developed a gigantic spying apparatus.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Protecting Snowden
feature American whistle-blower Edward Snowden has proved a master spy with his “meticulously timed operation.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Listening in on Europeans
feature Europeans are apoplectic over the U.S. National Security Agency's massive PRISM surveillance program.
By The Week Staff Last updated