Unfairly blaming Pakistan
Pakistanis react to the failed Times Square bombing.
Blaming Pakistan for the failed Times Square bombing is insulting and just plain wrong, said the Peshawar Frontier Post in an editorial. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned this week that Pakistan would face “very severe consequences” if any successful attack were traced back to this country. It sure would have been prudent if, “before shooting off her odious bluster,” Clinton had “given a little thought as to why American Muslim youths were getting radicalized.” Because even if it’s true that accused Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad got his bomb training in Pakistan’s Waziristan tribal area, “that doesn’t wash out the incontrovertible fact that he had imbibed radicalization toward terrorism right inside the United States, not outside of it.”
We can’t escape blame that easily, said Ardeshir Cowasjee in the Karachi Dawn. Shahzad is, after all, a Pakistani. So was Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and so were most of the 2005 London train bombers and plenty of other notorious terrorists. There is obviously something “radically wrong” with Pakistan that it “manages to produce so many young men who are violence-prone.” I believe that it all began with Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, Pakistan’s dictator from 1977 to 1988 and “a devout worshipper at the altar of his own dangerous brand of Islam.” Zia “brainwashed” the Pakistani army with “the joys of jihad,” and he encouraged all Pakistanis to support the mujahedin in neighboring Afghanistan. To this day, jihadists the world over know that they “can come to Pakistan and learn how to make bombs to blow up themselves, if they so wish, and many others.”
The U.S. is right to be angry at Pakistan for being a haven for terrorists, said Shafqat Mahmood in the Islamabad News. But we Pakistanis are just as angry. After all, Pakistanis, not Americans, are the victims of the vast majority of attacks by Pakistan-based terror groups. The good news is that “never before has the state and its armed forces been more committed to fight against militant groups as it is today.” The army is already fighting bravely in Swat, Bajaur, Buner, South Waziristan, and Orakzai. “The international community needs to understand the difficult nature of this struggle and, instead of blaming Pakistan or putting undue pressure on it, give it practical support.” We could use economic aid and counterterrorism training. “Just continuing the mantra of ‘Do more’ is unhelpful.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In fact, it’s the U.S. that needs to do something—get out of Afghanistan, said Zahid Malik in the Islamabad Pakistan Observer. The militants based in Pakistan are there because of the Afghan conflict. Once U.S. troops leave Afghanistan, many of the militants will leave Pakistan. Those groups that are Pakistani-grown will be deprived of their main propaganda point—that Pakistan is supporting foreign invaders. But as long as U.S. troops stay on, “the menace will continue to spread, and American citizens will remain hostage to threats and fear.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Was the Azerbaijan Airlines plane shot down?
Today's Big Question Multiple sources claim Russian anti-aircraft missile damaged passenger jet, leading to Christmas Day crash that killed at least 38
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine hints at end to 'hot war' with Russia in 2025
Talking Points Could the new year see an end to the worst European violence of the 21st Century?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
What does the FDIC do?
In the Spotlight Deposit insurance builds confidence in the banking system
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
No equipment for Afghanistan
feature The U.S. has reportedly decided to hand over to Pakistan some $7 billion worth of American military hardware currently in Afghanistan.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Crudely insulting our allies
feature Well, at least we know now what the Americans really think of us.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Spied-upon Germans are not mollified
feature In the wake of revelations last year about the NSA's spying activities, relations between Germany and the U.S. have been at an all-time low.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Is a deal with the U.S. in Iran’s interest?
feature The “unprecedented enthusiasm” of Western diplomats after the talks in Geneva suggests they received unexpected concessions from the Iranians.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
How they see us: Sowing chaos in Libya
feature The kidnapping of Abu Anas al-Libi is an outrage committed against Libyan sovereignty—and it will have repercussions.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Europe is complicit in spying
feature It’s not just the Americans who have developed a gigantic spying apparatus.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Protecting Snowden
feature American whistle-blower Edward Snowden has proved a master spy with his “meticulously timed operation.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Listening in on Europeans
feature Europeans are apoplectic over the U.S. National Security Agency's massive PRISM surveillance program.
By The Week Staff Last updated