Should Goldman Sachs just settle?

Commentators argue over whether the powerful Wall Street firm should strike a deal to end its legal troubles — or fight to clear its name

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein fends off reporters after a federal hearing.
(Image credit: Getty)

The legal assault on Goldman Sachs is growing — just days after federal regulators accused Goldman of fraud, the Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into whether Goldman employees duped investors who bought mortgage-backed securities from the firm. Now, the Wall Street powerhouse faces a difficult decision: Tarnish its reputation by admitting wrongdoing under a deal to avoid prosecution, or enter a potentially devastating legal battle by continuing to insist it did nothing wrong. What should Goldman do? (Watch a Fox report about Goldman Sachs' settlement pros and cons)

Settling is the only way to end the bleeding: "It's time for Goldman to reach for the checkbook," says Henry Blodget in Business Insider. It will be "galling and humiliating" for the bank to pay a $1 billion-plus fine when it insists it did nothing wrong. But the firm's nosediving stock price has already cost it $21 billion in market value, and the specter of criminal charges only makes matters worse.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up