The political battle over regulating Wall Street
Senate Democrats brought a financial reform package to the floor while Goldman Sachs executives endured 10 hours of questioning and Republicans balked at a number of provisions in the bill.
What happened
Senate Democrats brought a financial reform package to the floor this week, after portraying filibustering Republicans as defenders of Wall Street. The jockeying unfolded in an atmosphere of recrimination against the financial industry, as executives from Goldman Sachs endured 10 hours of harsh questioning by a Senate panel investigating Goldman’s business practices. Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein said the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent accusation that his firm had engaged in fraud was “one of the worst days of my professional life,’’ and he maintained that Goldman’s clients understood the risks they were taking on. But Democrats charged that Goldman knowingly sold derivatives based on bad mortgages and then bet they would lose value, thus helping to create the 2008 economic collapse. After three days of blocking a vote on new regulations, meanwhile, Republicans agreed to let legislation reach the floor, where they hoped to amend it. “I remain deeply troubled by a number of provisions in this bill,’’ said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
Republicans said they had won some concessions from Democrats in negotiations, including the elimination of a $50 billion fund designed to “wind down’’ failed institutions. Disagreements remained on the best way to regulate derivatives, the financial instruments that allow investors to bet on the direction of prices of stocks, mortgages, and other assets. Senators in both parties are expected to offer numerous amendments, and the final bill must be reconciled with a reform bill that passed the House in December. Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd promised that new regulations would “create a sound foundation for our nation’s future economic strength,” saying, “It’s time for this debate to begin.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the editorials said
The prospects for reform got a boost this week from “America’s pre-eminent investment house,” said TheEconomist.com. Public testimony by Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein and other executives provided “no smoking gun,” but helped senators paint Wall Street firms as immoral, profit-seeking sharks. Blankfein seemed “baffled” at the outrage over derivatives and the massive losses suffered by those who bought them.
Goldman is a convenient scapegoat for Democrats, said The Wall Street Journal. To find the “root causes of the crisis” on Wall Street, Congress should focus its attention on the “toxic twins”—Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These and other government entities were responsible for more than $2.7 trillion in bad mortgages—“three times Goldman’s entire balance sheet.” Yet the Democrats’ plan includes “no reform of Fannie and Freddie.”
What the columnists said
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rather than quibble with Democrats over details of reform, said Matthew Continetti in TheWeeklyStandard.com, the GOP should demand an even stronger bill. Why not “break up the banks” into smaller entities or “raise Cain about the rating agencies” that certified junk mortgages as AAA investments? Some “structural changes” make sense, said Terry Savage in the Chicago Sun-Times, such as returning to the “separation of banking and investment activities” that kept the banking system sound for 70 years before deregulation in 1999. But only by adopting a government-planned economy like that of Cuba or the old Soviet Union can the U.S. avoid the booms and busts inevitable in free markets.
The real problem is the financial industry’s “skewed incentives,” said James Grant in The Washington Post. Executives would be far more responsible if they knew that they would be held personally liable for losses incurred by banks and investment firms, with their homes, boats, cars, and other assets being sold off to pay creditors. In Brazil, when a bank fails, directors, senior officers, and controlling shareholders lose everything they’ve got. Now that’s how you “bring the fear of God back to Wall Street.”
A little adult supervision would suffice, said Bethany McLean in The New York Times. The 2008 meltdown was above all a failure of oversight. After refusing to regulate derivatives, and repealing the Glass-Steagall Act separating investment and commercial banking, Congress “sat by idly as consumer advocates warned that people were getting loans they’d never be able to pay back.” Senators clearly enjoyed bellowing at Goldman executives for their reckless ways. “Shouldn’t Congress have its turn on the hot seat as well?”
-
How Harris and Trump differ on education
The Explainer Trump wants to disband the Department of Education. Harris wants to boost teacher pay.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How to minimize capital gains tax on investments
The Explainer It can take a chunk out of your profits
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published
-
Crossword: November 4, 2024
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
The battle over religious exemptions for companies
feature Conservative Supreme Court justices expressed support for Hobby Lobby's request to be exempted from the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The plane that ‘vanished into thin air’
feature Officials from 25 countries focused their search on two vast northern and southern corridors that the Boeing 777 may have traveled.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Debt-ridden Detroit files for bankruptcy
feature Detroit entered uncharted waters after it became the largest American city to file for bankruptcy.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Justices weigh gene patents
feature Several U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism over whether companies can patent genes.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Romney under pressure over tax returns
feature Mitt Romney’s campaign was left on the defensive this week, after the Obama campaign launched a series of attacks on his business record.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
An economy stuck in the doldrums
feature The outlook for the American economy darkened, as the latest jobs report showed it settling into a prolonged stagnation.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Is the jobs outlook improving?
feature Private-sector employment has climbed by an average of 250,000 jobs a month for three months running, but the economy is still struggling and unemployment remains high.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
A divided high court gets down to business
feature The Supreme Court faces a slew of controversial cases that are likely to expose deep divisions between the court’s liberal and conservative wings.
By The Week Staff Last updated