Justices weigh gene patents

Several U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism over whether companies can patent genes.

Several U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism this week over whether companies can patent genes, during a hearing that could reshape the future of the biotech industry. The court heard arguments over patents held by Myriad Genetics on two human genes, which, when mutated, give a woman a higher risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. The patents give the Utah firm a monopoly on testing for those mutations. A lawyer for Myriad said that voiding the patents would deter other scientists and investors from trying to make advances with natural materials. But Justice Elena Kagan questioned whether, under Myriad’s argument, a patent could be awarded to the “first person who found a liver.” And Justice Samuel Alito—a conservative—noted that while a company could patent the process used to extract a cancer treatment from a leaf, it could not “patent the plant” itself.

Granting these absurd patents is not in the public interest, said Marcy Darnovsky in the Los Angeles Times. Myriad’s strict patent enforcement “means its test is the only available one to determine whether a woman has a genetic variant that increases her risk of cancer.” Women can’t get a second opinion, even when facing a decision about removing a healthy organ to lower their cancer risk.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
Explore More