Can Freddie and Fannie be saved?
In Congress, a debate erupts over whether the government can -- or should -- save government-run mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
A debate is breaking out in Washington over how and when the government should reform beleaguered mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told Congress last week that the administration still has to "take a fresh, cold, hard look at the core problems" that nearly ruined Fannie and Freddie before unveiling a reform plan, which is expected next year. But some Republicans want the administration to immediately start phasing out the institutions, which the government took over as they crumbled during the housing meltdown. Are Fannie and Freddie worth saving?
Propping up Fannie and Freddie only makes matters worse: "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the poster children for what is wrong with 'state capitalism' or economic fascism,'" says Richard W. Rahn in The Washington Times. These government-backed behemoths helped cause the mortgage crisis with their "unsound financial practices," then, instead of letting them go bankrupt, the government bailed them out. As long as the government props them up, the "bad practices" will continue.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Getting rid of them is risky: "Privatization would get bureaucrats out of the thorny area of housing finance," says Brian Wingfield in Forbes, but, as we have learned the hard way, private banks sometimes need bailing out, too. So cutting the government's ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won't "resolve a hallmark problem of the financial crisis: how the government deals with a firm that's considered too big to fail."
"What to do about Fannie and Freddie"
Nuking Fannie and Freddie won't change anything: The problem with Fannie and Freddie was their unique relationship with the government, says David Indiviglio in The Atlantic. As "government-sponsored mortgage entities," they got all the profits from their business, and taxpayers assumed the risk. Timothy Geithner is on record saying that has to change, but reform will have to wait, because doing it now would rattle the housing market further before it has had the chance to stabilize.
"Geithner provides philosophy, not a plan, on Fannie and Freddie"
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Today's political cartoons - October 5, 2024
Cartoons Saturday's cartoons - gathering funds, juggling tariffs, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 category 5 cartoons about hurricane Helene
Artists take on precarious conditions, planning ahead, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Wolfs: 'comedy thriller' stumbles despite George Clooney and Brad Pitt
While the crime caper might 'pleasingly pass a Saturday night' its star-studded duo cannot ultimately salvage it
By The Week UK Published