Haitian seismologist Claude Prepetit, who predicted last month's earthquake, is warning that an even stronger one could hit Port-au-Prince within 20 years. Given this threat, should Haiti and the international community rebuild the country's devastated capital, home to more than 2 million people, on the same spot — or move it to a new, safer location? (Watch a CBS report about relief efforts in Port-au-Prince)
The capital must be moved: It might make sense to rebuild the capital on the spot if Haiti could expect 200 years of calm before the next disaster, says geologist Tim Dixon, as quoted in Time. But "our findings suggest another shoe has to drop," soon, and closer to Port-au-Prince. The responsible thing to do is move the capital to the north, out of harm's way.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Haiti has no choice in the short term: Even if the Haitian government decides against moving the capital permanently, say Jim Arkedis and Mike Derham in Progressive Fix, it has no choice but to move its nerve center for now. "Port-au-Prince has been reduced to a rubble heap," and during demolition and rebuilding the government and the United Nations peacekeeping mission should move to Haiti's second city, Cap-Haitien, on the north coast.
It makes sense, but might not work: Thousands of evacuees already have already been moved out of Port-au-Prince, say Andres Viglucci and Scott Hiaasen in The Miami Herald. But experts warn that mass-relocations following catastrophes elsewhere have often failed — refugees tend to return even to devastated cities, still hoping to find "jobs and economic opportunity."
SEE MORE OF THE WEEK'S COVERAGE OF THE HAITI DISASTER:
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.