Abortion: The Democrats’ bitter pill
To get the votes of pro-life Democrats, the House amended its health-care bill to ban abortion coverage in any insurance plan subsidized with taxpayer dollars.
We’ve just witnessed a “coup,” said The New York Times in an editorial. Women won the legal right to an abortion nearly four decades ago, yet to get the votes of pro-life Democrats, the House of Representatives amended its health-care legislation last week to ban abortion coverage in any insurance plan subsidized with taxpayer dollars. The amendment was the subject of a fierce lobbying campaign by the Catholic Church, and goes far beyond the existing Hyde Amendment ban on the use of federal dollars to pay for abortions. It will likely force private insurance companies participating in federal plans to drop abortion coverage altogether. What a betrayal by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats, said Frances Kissling in Salon.com. Pelosi decided to throw abortion rights overboard to win passage of health-care legislation in the House, and “many Democratic women were shocked.” Who would have thought that by electing a Democratic president and a Democratic Congress, we’d take a big step backward on freedoms women had fought so hard to achieve?
Liberals have only themselves to blame for their predicament, said Philip Klein in The American Spectator Online. When you take health care out of private hands and put decisions in the hands of government, you make political intrusion into private decisions inevitable. Yet in opposing government limits on abortion, liberal Democrats found themselves arguing “against government command and control,” as if they suddenly found this notion distasteful. Have they no sense of irony? No—and no common sense, either, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial. “If ObamaCare becomes law,’’ every medical decision—from whether an MRI can be used in routine testing to whether cancer patients have access to expensive new drugs—will become subject to politics, moral disputes, and budget concerns.
That argument is both naïve and deceptive, said Ezra Klein in TheWashingtonPost.com, because the federal government is already deeply involved in the health-care system. By exempting employer-sponsored health-care benefits from taxes, the government now enables about 157 million middle-class and wealthy Americans to have all the health care they want—including free or low-cost abortions. The House version of health-care reform won’t affect women with private insurance. Only women who are poor or unemployed and need government subsidies will be denied coverage for abortions. So this dispute isn’t really about choice or about “life.’’ It’s about class.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The Week contest: Swift stimulus
Puzzles and Quizzes
By The Week US Published
-
'It's hard to resist a sweet deal on a good car'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
10 concert tours to see this winter
The Week Recommends Keep warm traveling the United States — and the world — to see these concerts
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published