Terrorism plot: The waterboarding question

Najibullah Zazi was arrested last week and charged with planning to attack transit systems and sports stadiums with homemade bombs, but his accomplices remain at large.

Many experts say it was “the most serious terror plot in the U.S. since Sept. 11, 2001,” said The San Diego Union-Tribune in an editorial. Last week, federal authorities charged former Manhattan doughnut-cart vendor and Afghan immigrant Najibullah Zazi with planning to attack transit systems and sports stadiums with homemade bombs stuffed into backpacks. Zazi, who allegedly confessed that al Qaida had trained him in Pakistan, was caught with bomb-making instructions, a cache of volatile household chemicals, and incriminating equipment. But although two men were arrested with him, authorities say that at least three co-conspirators—and perhaps more than a dozen—remain at large. That sounds something like the “ticking time bomb” scenario that arises every time we debate the morality of torture, said Michael Crowley in The New Republic Online. The idea that authorities might physically abuse Zazi to get his accomplices’ names appalls me. But then I imagine “how I would feel if a bomb kills someone I know on the New York subway next week.”

So is it “time to break the waterboard out of storage?” said Jeffrey Toobin in Newyorker.com. “I think not—and not just because it’s illegal.” The Justice Department has been tracking Zazi for months, tapping his phone calls and e-mails. So the government probably already knows the identities of his cohorts. Torturing or harshly interrogating Zazi would only make it impossible to try him and other suspects in any U.S. court of law. And let’s say we torture Zazi, only to have a bomb explode anyway, said A. Serwer in The American Prospect Online. Liberals would predictably argue that this proves torture doesn’t work, while conservatives would just as predictably respond that we should have used even harsher tactics. Must we rehash this tired debate “every single time there’s news of a potential terrorist attack?”

No, but Zazi’s arrest does demolish another debate, said the New York Daily News. For years, the Left has disputed the need for extensive surveillance of phone calls, e-mails, and other activities to stop terrorist plots. Now that the Obama Justice Department has used surveillance to stop a major attack, civil libertarians should quit complaining, and Congress should leave the Patriot Act alone. Obama deserves credit for letting investigators use all available tools to foil Zazi’s plot, said The Wall Street Journal. Wouldn’t it be nice if this president would “publicly acknowledge” his predecessor for making this arrest possible?

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us