Gun massacres: Taking aim at the innocent
Over the past month, more than 50 people have been gunned down in violent massacres.
For any nut with a gun, it’s been an open season on innocent Americans, said The Washington Post in an editorial. On March 10, Michael McLendon shot 11 people to death, including himself, in a murder spree that spanned two Alabama counties. On March 29, the same day that Robert Stewart gunned down a nurse and seven elderly people in a nursing home in Carthage, N.C., Devan Kalathat slaughtered his family in Santa Clara, Calif. This past weekend James Harrison fatally shot his family, including his five children, in Graham, Wash. Last Friday, Jiverly Wong, a Vietnamese immigrant distraught over losing a job and taunted about his limited English, entered the American Civic Association in Binghamton, N.Y., and used two guns to kill 13 students, employees, and himself. Throw in the recent slayings of seven cops in Oakland and Pittsburgh, said Ted Anthony in the Associated Press, and that’s more than 50 dead within a month. Our mouths gape, the mind reels, and no one, it seems, can answer the question: “Why are we killing each other?”
I can’t explain the why, said Harold Evans in TheDailybeast.com, but the how is obvious. This is a country awash in guns, a country whose murder rate—“highest among civilized nations”—is directly connected to the ease with which virtually any seething psychopath or criminal can purchase a firearm. For that, blame the fanatical leaders of the National Rifle Association, who have convinced millions of decent, law-abiding gun owners that any gun control law—no matter how reasonable—is part of a plot to take away all guns. Blame, too, the congressmen and senators who run scared of the NRA and are corrupted by its millions in campaign and PAC contributions. The Second Amendment speaks of a “well-regulated militia’’—not an armed free-for-all in which angry loners and the insane can easily buy assault weapons made for military use.
It wouldn’t be hard to put a stop to these massacres, said John Lott in Foxnews.com. If more citizens were armed, these madmen wouldn’t have the courage to start shooting—or they’d be quickly shot down. “Every multiple-victim public shooting I have studied where more than three people have been killed has taken place where guns are banned.” In these “gun-free zones,” law-abiding citizens are sitting ducks, and killers can turn scores of people into helpless victims. If the media reported these massacres accurately, the headlines would read: “Another killing spree in a gun-free zone.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
The CIA is openly recruiting foreign spies in other countries
In the Spotlight The agency is posting instructions in multiple languages for people to contact them
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'People want to understand food — but only to a point'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How do cash-back apps work and are they worth it?
The Explainer Put a percentage of the amount you spend back in your pocket
By Becca Stanek, The Week US Published