Shifting sands in Iraq

With the U.S. testing gains and bringing home the first wave of soldiers sent during the

What happened

The U.S. is testing the gains made with this year’s troop buildup by bringing home the first wave of soldiers sent during the “surge.” President Bush sent 30,000 extra troops in mid-February, and over the last two months U.S. military and Iraqi civilian deaths have fallen sharply.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The progress has left congressional Democrats flummoxed, too, said the New York Daily News in an editorial. Instead of responding to “facts on the ground,” they continue trying to “ram through” “pull-out-of-Iraq” bills, one after another. These “symbolic measures” are “increasingly counterproductive and will likely come back to haunt the party.”

Democrats are already “confronting some demoralizing arithmetic on Iraq,” said Jim VandeHei and John F. Harris in The Politico. They’ve forced 40 votes on limiting Bush’s war policy, and lost every time but once. And Bush simply vetoed that bill. But “both sides must contemplate the most dispiriting piece of Iraq arithmetic of all”—this has already been the deadliest year of the war for our soldiers.

Conservative war supporters just “see what they want to see,” said Brian Katulis in the Los Angeles Times (free registration). But civilian deaths may be down because refugees have fled by the thousands. And Iraq's “mutliple civil wars” are no closer to peaceful resolution than they were before the surge.