Controversy of the week
Subsidized health care: How poor is needy?
Subsidized health care: How poor is needy?
No wonder nobody talks about compassionate conservatism anymore, said E.J. Dionne in The Washington Post. Before President Bush’s veto last week of an expanded S-CHIP program, which provides health care to needy children not poor enough to qualify for Medicare, 12-year-old Graeme Frost of Baltimore recorded a radio appeal in support of the bill. Frost and his sister suffered serious brain injuries in a 2004 car crash, and have relied on the S-CHIP program for their extended hospital stays, rehabilitation, and subsequent care. No sooner did the political advertisement air, however, than right-wing bloggers and talk-show hosts started attacking the Frosts. The Frosts, the critics said with no little venom, are middleclass homeowners who own three cars and send their children to private school! By relying on a government-funded health-care program, they were obviously ripping off the system.
Within days, the attack on Graeme and his family had become an "all-out smear campaign," said Paul Krugman in The New York Times. Columnist Michelle Malkin even drove past the Frosts' house for a closer look at its opulence . . . and then the story started falling apart. It seems the Frosts paid a mere $55,000 for their dilapidated house in 1990 and spent years fixing it up themselves. The children attend private school on scholarship. The couple has a household income of only $45,000, with no employer-provided health insurance. Even if you have no sympathy for the working poor, what kind of "vicious political movement" makes its arguments by attacking injured children?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516-320-80.jpg)
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Let me see if I have this straight, said William Voegeli in The New York Sun. It was fine for Democrats to use the Frosts' predicament to make a political point, but an unspeakable act of savagery for conservatives to then investigate that predicament? That seems a little unfair. All conservatives are asking, said Mark Steyn in National Review Online, is for an honest debate on whether taxpayers should bestow free health care on middle-class families as well as the poor. If Democrats don't want the Graeme Frosts of this world dragged into that debate, maybe "next time put up someone in long pants to make your case."
Admittedly, the Democrats used the boy to make a political point, said Cynthia Tucker in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. But it was over "an issue that matters-health care for children of working families." Republicans, you'll recall, carpeted the nation with upsetting photographs of a comatose Terri Schiavo to stoke their conservative base into a frenzy. "It seems a bit churlish of them to complain when the tables are turned." In fairness, said Joan Walsh in Salon.com, the right probably had to demonize a brain-damaged 12-year-old. "They know they're on the losing side of this issue, politically and morally."
No, we're not, said syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin. First of all, the bill the president vetoed didn't even apply to families like the Frosts, who are already covered by S-CHIP. What the president vetoed was the expansion of that program to cover middle-class families making up to $62,000 a year-which would hand another $35 billion in costs to overburdened taxpayers. A majority of Americans, according to the polls, doesn't support that expansion. That's why Democrats deliberately obscured the debate behind a flurry of "Romper Room politics." When this war of anecdote is over, said The Wall Street Journal in an editorial, we can all agree on one thing. "It's hard for some lower-income families like the Frosts to find affordable private health coverage." The real issue is whether the best solution is for the government-and taxpayers-to step into that gap, and provide the coverage for free.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Why the UK phone signal is so poor
Under The Radar Having trouble connecting? A lack of investment, planning rules and even your home could be to blame
By Elizabeth Carr-Ellis, The Week UK Published
-
Battleground states to watch in the 2024 election
In Depth These seven states could end up deciding who wins the White House this year
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Leave the crowds behind at these 7 sensational hotels
The Week Recommends Traveling in September means more room to explore
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Obamacare: Does the GOP have a better alternative?
feature Though the White House botched the rollout of the ACA, Americans have no desire to return to the status quo.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obamacare: Too complex to work?
feature The Affordable Care Act's “mind-numbing complexity” will make it difficult—too difficult?—to implement.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The GOP: Is the fight to defund Obamacare doomed?
feature It was a good week for Sen. Ted Cruz, but a disaster for a bitterly divided Republican Party.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obamacare: The GOP’s last stand
feature “The final battle against Obamacare” is about to begin.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
The GOP: Shutting down the government to stop Obamacare
feature Republicans are “testing a new frontier of radicalism” in a last-ditch effort to block the Affordable Care Act.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obamacare: Is the program already in trouble?
feature The White House announced a one-year delay in the Affordable Care Act's employer mandate.
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obamacare: Does California prove it can work?
feature Last week, California revealed that the premiums insurers will charge customers through its exchange are “surprisingly low.”
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Obamacare: Is the GOP raising the white flag?
feature “Washington’s repeal-Obamacare crowd is feeling a little lonely these days.”
By The Week Staff Last updated