Washington, D.C.
Supreme Court justices this week sharply questioned lawyers on both sides, as the court considered the constitutionality of a congressional ban on so-called partial-birth abortion. A coalition of reproductive-rights groups is challenging a 2003 law that bans the procedure, in which the fetus is extracted from the womb. During oral arguments, a lawyer for the Bush administration, which supports the ban, called the procedure “gruesome,” and said it is never medically necessary. But a lawyer for the pro-choice side cited medical literature suggesting the procedure can be necessary to protect the health of the mother, and argued that the ban interferes with the right to an abortion. Court watchers say that with two new anti-abortion justices on the Court, Chief Justice John Roberts and Samuel Alito, the case could prove to be a major test of the Court’s view of the Roe v. Wade abortion-rights case.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Violent videos of Charlie Kirk’s death are renewing debate over online censorshipTalking Points Social media ‘promises unfiltered access, but without guarantees of truth and without protection from harm’
-
What led to Poland invoking NATO’s Article 4 and where could it lead?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION After a Russian drone blitz, Warsaw’s rare move to invoke the important NATO statute has potentially moved Europe closer to continent-wide warfare
-
Africa could become the next frontier for space programsThe Explainer China and the US are both working on space applications for Africa
