London
A British court this week took up a lawsuit brought by two British historians who claim that the international best-seller The Da Vinci Code plagiarized their work. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh say that American author Dan Brown stole the most compelling ideas in his novel from their earlier nonfiction book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail. That book advances the controversial theory that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and that they had a daughter whose descendants married into a line of French kings. The novel follows a similar line. “It is not as though Brown has simply lifted a discrete series of raw facts,” said a lawyer for the two historians during his opening argument. “He has lifted the connections that join the points up.” Brown concedes that he read Holy Blood—indeed, his novel cites it directly at one point—but he argues that history can’t be copyrighted.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Fannie Flagg’s 6 favorite books that sparked her imaginationFeature The author recommends works by Johanna Spyri, John Steinbeck, and more
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Patrick Hemingway: The Hemingway son who tended to his father’s legacyFeature He was comfortable in the shadow of his famous father, Ernest Hemingway
