London
A British court this week took up a lawsuit brought by two British historians who claim that the international best-seller The Da Vinci Code plagiarized their work. Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh say that American author Dan Brown stole the most compelling ideas in his novel from their earlier nonfiction book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail. That book advances the controversial theory that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and that they had a daughter whose descendants married into a line of French kings. The novel follows a similar line. “It is not as though Brown has simply lifted a discrete series of raw facts,” said a lawyer for the two historians during his opening argument. “He has lifted the connections that join the points up.” Brown concedes that he read Holy Blood—indeed, his novel cites it directly at one point—but he argues that history can’t be copyrighted.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
Big Tech's answer for AI-driven job loss: universal basic incomeIn The Spotlight A new study reveals the strengths and limitations
-
'I will not be silent' on Gaza, says Kamala HarrisSpeed Read In a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Harris supported Israel's right to defend itself while expressing a desire to end Palestinian suffering
-
'How long can TikTok dominate as a social network?'Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
