Why no woman should sit on the throne.

Japan

Hideki Nagane

Asahi Shimbun

Japan’s ban on women inheriting the throne may seem sexist, said Hideki Nagane in Tokyo’s Asahi Shimbun. But it would be a mistake to repeal it, as lawmakers are now considering doing in a rush of political correctness. Under the system that has guided the Chrysanthemum Throne for 125 generations, since the time of Emperor Jinmu, when an emperor dies leaving only daughters, “the baton is passed to a male heir of a related family.” He may want to make his own child empress, but the law does not allow it. “At the core of the practice is the idea that the throne does not personally belong to the emperor.” It is an institution supported by the large, extended group of royal families. The possibility that the throne could come to a different branch encourages “ties and cooperation” among these families, “which gives rise to harmony.” Japan’s legislature only recently—just after World War II—got the power to change the laws governing the Imperial House. For centuries, such matters were the purview of the Imperial Household Council. The Diet should not use its power too hastily. “We must not think about matters just to suit our own generation, but must also respect our ancestors and think of posterity.”

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up