Brazil
Jorge Marirrodriga
El País (Spain)
It’s always a bit awkward when a party official gets caught smuggling wads of cash, said Jorge Marirrodriga in Madrid’s El País. When the money is discovered in his neatly folded underpants during a baggage search, though, it’s downright embarrassing. An official with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s Workers Party was caught that way earlier this month, with no plausible explanation why he had chosen to stash $185,000 among his unmentionables. The discovery lent credence to opposition allegations that Workers members had been bribing other legislators to side with the president. The growing corruption scandal threatened to engulf Lula himself, but he quickly “deflected blame.” Claiming that his underlings acted without his knowledge, the president purged his Cabinet, “sacrificing many longtime friends and collaborators” and appointing opposition party members in their places. So far, his tactic has worked. Less than one-third of Brazilians believe that Lula was in on the bribery scheme. But now he has to “maintain peace in a Cabinet with members from seven different parties,” some of them considerably far to the right. He may have saved his government—but at the expense of achieving his leftist goals.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Nepal chooses toddler as its new ‘living goddess’Under the Radar Girls between two and four are typically chosen to live inside the temple as the Kumari – until puberty strikes
-
October 5 editorial cartoonsCartoons Sunday's political cartoons include half-truth hucksters, Capitol lockdown, and more
-
Jaguar Land Rover’s cyber bailoutTalking Point Should the government do more to protect business from the ‘cyber shockwave’?
