Washington, D.C.
Bush administration lawyers concluded last year that torturing terrorists captured abroad might be justified to prevent future attacks, The Wall Street Journal reported this week. In any case, Pentagon lawyers wrote in a March 2003 memo, neither U.S. law nor international treaties prevented President Bush from approving any interrogation techniques he deemed necessary for national security. “In order to respect the president’s inherent constitutional authority to manage a military campaign,” the memo states, the prohibition against torture “must be construed as inapplicable.” The logic outraged human rights groups. “It is by leaps and bounds the worst thing I’ve seen since this whole Abu Ghraib scandal broke,” said Tom Malinowski of Human Rights Watch. White House officials said that, despite the legal advice, Bush ordered the military to treat all prisoners humanely—even al Qaida terrorists.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
How would we know if World War Three had started?Today's Big Question Conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific mean the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
-
Death Cafe: where people talk mortality over tea and cakeWhy everyone's talking about The meet-ups are intended to offer a judgement-free and respectful space to discuss the end of life
-
Mark Menzies: Tories investigate MP after 'bad people' cash claimsSpeed Read Fylde MP will sit as an independent while party looks into allegations he misused campaign funds on medical expenses and blackmail pay-out
