The Hague
The International Court of Justice opened a hearing this week on the legality of the Israeli barrier being built in the West Bank. The case was brought by the U.N. General Assembly. Palestinians argued that the wall constitutes a human-rights violation and an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land. The court’s ruling, expected in a few months, could have political and symbolic weight, but it is not legally binding, because Israel does not recognize the court’s jurisdiction on the matter. Israel says the wall, intended to keep out suicide bombers, is a national-security question and therefore beyond the International Court’s authority. Outside the courthouse, Israeli protesters carried photos of bombing victims, chanting, “Put Palestinian terror on trial.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Denmark’s record-setting arms purchase raises eyebrows and anxietyIN THE SPOTLIGHT By eschewing American-made munitions for their European counterparts, the Danish government is bracing for Russian antagonism and sending a message to the West
-
Is hate speech still protected speech?Talking Points Pam Bondi’s threat to target hate speech raises concerns
-
‘Mental health care is health care’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
