Fargo, N.D.
A North Dakota woman has filed suit against the doctor who circumcised her son in 1997, even though she consented to the procedure and nothing went wrong. Anita Flatt, who filed the lawsuit, contends the doctor didn’t warn her about the pain and risks her son faced. “The practice,” her lawyer said, “is absolutely barbaric.” Lawyers for the hospital, MeritCare Medical Center, said the suit was part of a crusade to “abolish” routine circumcisions. In the 1960s, 90 percent of newborn American boys were circumcised, but questions about the medical usefulness of the tradition have now cut the rate to 60 percent. Critics say circumcision is a needless “mutilation” that actually reduces both male and female sexual pleasure.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
10 upcoming albums to stream during the winter chillThe Week Recommends As the calendar turns to 2026, check out some new music from your favorite artists
-
Kristi Noem might not be long for TrumplandIN THE SPOTLIGHT The Homeland Security secretary has been one of the most visible and vocal architects of Trump’s anti-immigration efforts, even as her own star risks fading
-
Senate votes down ACA subsidies, GOP alternativeSpeed Read The Senate rejected the extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits, guaranteeing a steep rise in health care costs for millions of Americans
