Fargo, N.D.
A North Dakota woman has filed suit against the doctor who circumcised her son in 1997, even though she consented to the procedure and nothing went wrong. Anita Flatt, who filed the lawsuit, contends the doctor didn’t warn her about the pain and risks her son faced. “The practice,” her lawyer said, “is absolutely barbaric.” Lawyers for the hospital, MeritCare Medical Center, said the suit was part of a crusade to “abolish” routine circumcisions. In the 1960s, 90 percent of newborn American boys were circumcised, but questions about the medical usefulness of the tradition have now cut the rate to 60 percent. Critics say circumcision is a needless “mutilation” that actually reduces both male and female sexual pleasure.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Why are student loan borrowers falling behind on payments?Today's Big Question Delinquencies surge as the Trump administration upends the program
-
Not there yet: The frustrations of the pocket AIFeature Apple rushes to roll out its ‘Apple Intelligence’ features but fails to deliver on promises
-
George Foreman: The boxing champ who reinvented home grillsFeature He helped define boxing’s golden era
