Fargo, N.D.
A North Dakota woman has filed suit against the doctor who circumcised her son in 1997, even though she consented to the procedure and nothing went wrong. Anita Flatt, who filed the lawsuit, contends the doctor didn’t warn her about the pain and risks her son faced. “The practice,” her lawyer said, “is absolutely barbaric.” Lawyers for the hospital, MeritCare Medical Center, said the suit was part of a crusade to “abolish” routine circumcisions. In the 1960s, 90 percent of newborn American boys were circumcised, but questions about the medical usefulness of the tradition have now cut the rate to 60 percent. Critics say circumcision is a needless “mutilation” that actually reduces both male and female sexual pleasure.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
5 fact-checked cartoons about Meta firing its fact checkersCartoons Artists take on playing chicken, information superhighway, and more
-
NCHIs: the controversy over non-crime hate incidentsThe Explainer Is the policing of non-crime hate incidents an Orwellian outrage or an essential tool of modern law enforcement?
-
Islamic State: the terror group's second actTalking Point Isis has carried out almost 700 attacks in Syria over the past year, according to one estimate
