Has the U.S. learned nothing from the Iraq debacle? asked Belgium's De Standaard in an editorial. The Bush administration just updated its national security strategy for the first time in four years, and it actually reaffirmed the doctrine of 'œpreventive war.' Under the doctrine, the U.S. reserves the right to invade any country if it has 'œsuspicions, however vague, that the country poses a possible threat.' Adopting this illegal policy back in 2002 was indefensible, but at least it was somewhat understandable. It was just a year after the 9/11 attacks, and the U.S. was jittery. But now the U.S. has the experience of the Iraq war, a war of 'œpre-emption' on an enemy that, it turns out, had no weapons of mass destruction. It is 'œmind-boggling' that the Americans still believe in a strategy that so flagrantly failed them.
Amazingly, American leaders don't see it as a failure, said Pablo Pardo in Spain's El Mundo. They argue that the point of pre-emption was to make sure that Saddam Hussein would never attack them with weapons of mass destruction. And now he never can! That he couldn't have done so in the first place is apparently beside the point, because he made them fear he could. The doctrine specifically notes that 'œlies and bluffs are a dangerous game that dictators play at their peril.' That sentence is both an excuse for the Iraq war and a warning about the coming showdown with Iran. Indeed, threats against Iran permeate the entire 49-page strategy document. Where the 2002 doctrine mentioned Iraq only once, the 2006 doctrine 'œnames Iran 16 times.' It calls Iran the world's leading supporter of terrorism, and threatens 'œconfrontation' if diplomatic efforts to halt Iran's nuclear weapons programs are not successful.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
A history of student protest at Columbia UniversityThe Explainer Anti-Israel demonstrations at NYC's Ivy League university echo protests against Vietnam War and South African apartheid
-
'Trump is ruled in contempt'Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
-
Hainault sword attack: police hunt for motiveSpeed Read Mental health is key line of inquiry, as detectives prepare to interview suspect
-
No equipment for Afghanistanfeature The U.S. has reportedly decided to hand over to Pakistan some $7 billion worth of American military hardware currently in Afghanistan.
-
How they see us: Crudely insulting our allies
feature Well, at least we know now what the Americans really think of us.
-
Spied-upon Germans are not mollified
feature In the wake of revelations last year about the NSA's spying activities, relations between Germany and the U.S. have been at an all-time low.
-
Is a deal with the U.S. in Iran’s interest?
feature The “unprecedented enthusiasm” of Western diplomats after the talks in Geneva suggests they received unexpected concessions from the Iranians.
-
How they see us: Sowing chaos in Libya
feature The kidnapping of Abu Anas al-Libi is an outrage committed against Libyan sovereignty—and it will have repercussions.
-
Europe is complicit in spying
feature It’s not just the Americans who have developed a gigantic spying apparatus.
-
Protecting Snowden
feature American whistle-blower Edward Snowden has proved a master spy with his “meticulously timed operation.”
-
Listening in on Europeans
feature Europeans are apoplectic over the U.S. National Security Agency's massive PRISM surveillance program.