Fixing the surveillance law
Verizon told congressional Democrats it gave federal authorities customer phone records hundreds of times, fueling debate over post-9/11 wiretapping. "It's time Congress found the gumption to stand up for civil liberties," said The Denver Post.
What happened
Verizon told congressional Democrats investigation the Bush administration’s post-9/11 surveillance program that it had given federal authorities customers’ phone records hundreds of times since 2005, The Washington Post reported Tuesday. President Bush wants Congress to grant retroactive and future immunity from lawsuits to companies that monitor conversations and examine phone records. Democrats have resisted.
What the commentators said
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“The argument for immunity is laughable,” said the Philadelphia Daily News in an editorial. The administration says it makes sense because phone companies would only be complying with the law, but Qwest mustered the courage to refuse cooperation—to protect its customers’ civil liberties. All the phone companies have to do is respect the Constitution, and they’ll have nothing to worry about.
“It's time Congress found the gumption to stand up for civil liberties” too, said The Denver Post in an editorial. Democrats will have to “push aside suggestions that their concerns mean they are ‘soft on terror.’” The companies are facing multi-million-dollar lawsuits for handing over information to the administration, but it serves them right. “Enough capitulation already,” it’s time for Congress to pass a law to ensure that the government doesn’t abuse its authority.
Democrats are undermining our national security by fighting Bush on this issue, said National Review Online in an editorial. Bush “embarrassed” them into approving a temporary fix for a domestic surveillance law that dates to the Cold War, but that expires in February. The U.S. needs an updated wiretapping law that recognizes “evolving technologies make our enemies more efficient and deadly.”
With so much “fire-breathing rhetoric,” said Benjamin Wittes in The New Republic Online, you’d think the Democratic proposal the House is considering to repair the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is miles apart from what Bush wants. It isn’t. “But don't tell anyone. It would spoil all the fun.”
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Home Depots are the new epicenters of ICE raids
In the Spotlight The chain has not provided many comments on the ongoing raids
-
Why does Trump keep interfering in the NYC mayoral race?
Today's Big Question The president has seemingly taken an outsized interest in his hometown elections, but are his efforts to block Zohran Mamdani about political expediency or something deeper?
-
The pros and cons of banning cellphones in classrooms
Pros and cons The devices could be major distractions