Trump drinks from the swamp
The Michael Cohen revelations reveal precisely how Trump has changed Washington
If you're a Trump scandal aficionado, Michael Cohen is the gift that keeps on giving. Whenever he vaults back into the news, you know it's going to be some combination of comical and appalling, and extremely bad for his old boss, the president of the United States.
As we learned this week, once President Trump was elected, a surprising number of wealthy and powerful people and organizations decided that if they were going to succeed in the new Washington, they needed access to the wisdom and insight of Michael Cohen. And they'd be willing to pay top dollar to get it. Yes, this ridiculous schlemiel — graduate of the country's worst law school, wannabe tough guy, possessor of a resting "Oh god, I'm going to jail" face — was suddenly the recipient of millions of dollars from corporations and people looking to influence the new president. What better way, after all, than going through his "personal lawyer"?
As documents made public by Stormy Daniels' lawyer Michael Avenatti show, last January, Cohen found himself fielding offers from multiple corporations with business before the federal government who wanted nothing more than to write him six-figure checks. When contacted by reporters, the companies offered laughable explanations for what they were getting from Cohen. AT&T paid him $200,000 to "provide insights into understanding the new administration." An investment firm called Columbus Nova that just so happens to have connections to the Kremlin says it gave him $500,000 "as a business consultant regarding potential sources of capital and potential investments in real estate and other ventures." Korea Aerospace Industries, which is competing for a large Air Force contract, said its payment of $150,000 to Cohen was for legal consulting involved in the organization of its "internal accounting system."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Perhaps most remarkably, the drugmaker Novartis signed a contract to pay Cohen $100,000 per month for a year to get his insights on health-care policy, but after a single meeting with him, they "determined that Michael Cohen and Essentials Consultants would be unable to provide the services that Novartis had anticipated." Yet they kept paying him the entire $1.2 million.
Maybe you find the idea that they would agree to pay him that much money without ever sitting down for a chat implausible. But at this point you're probably asking yourself: How do I get on this gravy train? Or, if you're thinking a bit less selfishly: Wasn't President Trump supposed to drain the swamp?
The truth is that Trump has indeed changed the culture of corruption in Washington, in two main ways.
First, he has made it significantly worse. There have been no alterations to the usual paths for the wealthy and powerful to exercise influence; instead, Trump has greased the wheels. If you're in the administration and you aren't someone who used to represent the corporations you're now regulating (and you'll return to after your stint in "public" service), then at the very least you're ideologically devoted to the principle of enhancing corporate power.
To take one vivid example of these two types: You're no doubt familiar with how scandal-plagued EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has held on to his job because Trump is pleased with his aggressive action to remove any impediment to corporations polluting as much as they please. What you may not know is that if Trump does fire him, the person who would take over is his deputy Andrew Wheeler. Wheeler's job before he became second-in-command at the agency responsible for protecting the environment? He was a coal lobbyist.
The second way Trump has changed the culture of corruption has been to make sure that he and his are the ones wetting their beaks. I'm reminded of something Adam Serwer wrote after former Washington mayor Marion Barry died: While he was widely (and correctly) viewed as a deeply corrupt figure, "Barry didn't bring corruption to D.C. He changed who benefited from it." Likewise, Trump has enabled his people to benefit from the corruption that already existed. Some of the hottest influence-peddlers in town are now not those who understand Capitol Hill or the way agencies operate, but those who have a personal connection to Trump.
And that's where all these payments to Cohen seem to come in. It's clear that there's more to this story, but it seems obvious that one way or another, these companies — and that mysterious Russian oligarch — thought they could get what they wanted from the government by going through Cohen. And they had plenty of money to spend.
All that being said, while you might not believe it, in many ways Washington is less corrupt than ever. While there's an occasional bribery scandal, the old-fashioned kind of corruption — the briefcase full of cash exchanged for a key vote — is far less common now than it was in earlier days. Disclosure laws, a larger news media sniffing around, and electronic record-keeping have combined to make it more difficult to put a congressman in your pocket the way a railroad baron used to do.
But as the saying goes, the real scandal is what's legal. Or at least that was the real scandal, until Donald Trump came to town.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Paul Waldman is a senior writer with The American Prospect magazine and a blogger for The Washington Post. His writing has appeared in dozens of newspapers, magazines, and web sites, and he is the author or co-author of four books on media and politics.
-
Instagram rolls out teen accounts with new limits
Speed Read After facing pushback over child safety, Meta announced that all users under 18 will have their Instagram accounts modified
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona official sues to bar 100K from local voting
Speed Read A large number of residents who have not submitted citizenship documents might be prevented from voting in the battleground state's elections
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Why is Laura Loomer making Republicans worried?
Today's Big Question Donald Trump says the MAGA influencer is a 'free spirit'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Biden, Trump urge calm after assassination attempt
Speed Reads A 20-year-old gunman grazed Trump's ear and fatally shot a rally attendee on Saturday
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Supreme Court rejects challenge to CFPB
Speed Read The court rejected a conservative-backed challenge to the way the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published