Companies told to link bosses' pay to performance
Some of the country's biggest firms have been told they should change the way they pay chief execs

The UK's 916 premium-listed companies are being asked to change the way they pay their chief executives. They have been told to link pay, including bonuses, to long-term performance – and even to take it back if businesses fail to be profitable.
The changes come in biennial guidelines issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), known as the UK Corporate Governance Code. They are enforced on a 'comply or explain' policy, meaning firms must follow suit or outline what alternative measures they have taken to ensure the same results.
The BBC says the rules could mean executives' bonuses are deferred for longer before being paid, with companies waiting to see if the people at the top have had a long-term positive impact before remunerating them.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
They may also trigger a move towards firms paying non-cash bonuses, such as shares, to get around the rules. The changes signal a new emphasis at the FRC on linking remuneration to a firm's long-term health, rather than short-term profits.
In the new code, published today, the FRC says: "Boards of listed companies will need to ensure that executive remuneration is aligned to the long-term success of the company and demonstrate this more clearly to shareholders.
"Executive directors’ remuneration should be designed to promote the long-term success of the company. Performance-related elements should be transparent, stretching and rigorously applied."
The guidelines also call on companies to introduce ways of recovering or withholding pay under certain conditions, without giving details of what exactly firms might be expected to do, or under what circumstances they should act.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
See the bright lights from these 7 big-city hotels
The Week Recommends Immerse yourself in culture, history and nightlife
-
Scientists want to regrow human limbs. Salamanders could lead the way.
Under the radar Humans may already have the genetic mechanism necessary
-
Sudoku medium: June 25, 2025
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
-
Labour shortages: the ‘most urgent problem’ facing the UK economy right now
Speed Read Britain is currently in the grip of an ‘employment crisis’
-
Will the energy war hurt Europe more than Russia?
Speed Read European Commission proposes a total ban on Russian oil
-
Will Elon Musk manage to take over Twitter?
Speed Read The world’s richest man has launched a hostile takeover bid worth $43bn
-
Shoppers urged not to buy into dodgy Black Friday deals
Speed Read Consumer watchdog says better prices can be had on most of the so-called bargain offers
-
Ryanair: readying for departure from London
Speed Read Plans to delist Ryanair from the London Stock Exchange could spell ‘another blow’ to the ‘dwindling’ London market
-
Out of fashion: Asos ‘curse’ has struck again
Speed Read Share price tumbles following the departure of CEO Nick Beighton
-
Universal Music’s blockbuster listing: don’t stop me now…
Speed Read Investors are betting heavily that the ‘boom in music streaming’, which has transformed Universal’s fortunes, ‘still has a long way to go’
-
EasyJet/Wizz: battle for air supremacy
Speed Read ‘Wizz’s cheeky takeover bid will have come as a blow to the corporate ego’