Companies told to link bosses' pay to performance
Some of the country's biggest firms have been told they should change the way they pay chief execs
The UK's 916 premium-listed companies are being asked to change the way they pay their chief executives. They have been told to link pay, including bonuses, to long-term performance – and even to take it back if businesses fail to be profitable.
The changes come in biennial guidelines issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), known as the UK Corporate Governance Code. They are enforced on a 'comply or explain' policy, meaning firms must follow suit or outline what alternative measures they have taken to ensure the same results.
The BBC says the rules could mean executives' bonuses are deferred for longer before being paid, with companies waiting to see if the people at the top have had a long-term positive impact before remunerating them.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
They may also trigger a move towards firms paying non-cash bonuses, such as shares, to get around the rules. The changes signal a new emphasis at the FRC on linking remuneration to a firm's long-term health, rather than short-term profits.
In the new code, published today, the FRC says: "Boards of listed companies will need to ensure that executive remuneration is aligned to the long-term success of the company and demonstrate this more clearly to shareholders.
"Executive directors’ remuneration should be designed to promote the long-term success of the company. Performance-related elements should be transparent, stretching and rigorously applied."
The guidelines also call on companies to introduce ways of recovering or withholding pay under certain conditions, without giving details of what exactly firms might be expected to do, or under what circumstances they should act.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Labour shortages: the ‘most urgent problem’ facing the UK economy right now
Speed Read Britain is currently in the grip of an ‘employment crisis’
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will the energy war hurt Europe more than Russia?
Speed Read European Commission proposes a total ban on Russian oil
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will Elon Musk manage to take over Twitter?
Speed Read The world’s richest man has launched a hostile takeover bid worth $43bn
By The Week Staff Last updated
-
Shoppers urged not to buy into dodgy Black Friday deals
Speed Read Consumer watchdog says better prices can be had on most of the so-called bargain offers
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ryanair: readying for departure from London
Speed Read Plans to delist Ryanair from the London Stock Exchange could spell ‘another blow’ to the ‘dwindling’ London market
By The Week Staff Published
-
Out of fashion: Asos ‘curse’ has struck again
Speed Read Share price tumbles following the departure of CEO Nick Beighton
By The Week Staff Published
-
Universal Music’s blockbuster listing: don’t stop me now…
Speed Read Investors are betting heavily that the ‘boom in music streaming’, which has transformed Universal’s fortunes, ‘still has a long way to go’
By The Week Staff Published
-
EasyJet/Wizz: battle for air supremacy
Speed Read ‘Wizz’s cheeky takeover bid will have come as a blow to the corporate ego’
By The Week Staff Published