The U.S. Department of State has compiled an annual report on human rights in other countries since the 1970s, but the recent edition from the Trump administration looks noticeably different. This has some outside observers questioning the department's methods, as the State Department now includes a slew of backtracks by the Trump administration about countries that have been accused of violating human rights.
What did the commentators say? The report contains individual databases about the human rights records of nearly every country in the world. But unlike prior editions, the latest report "drastically reduces the types of government repression and abuse that the United States under President Donald Trump deems worthy of criticism," said NPR. The State Department claims the report is "streamlined for better utility and accessibility."
But critics say the "reduced content lets authoritarians off the hook," said NPR. The Trump administration's report leaves out "language on persistent abuses in many nations that was present in prior reports," said The New York Times.
Language in sections on "El Salvador, Hungary, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Israel — all seen as close partners by the Trump administration" — is "scaled back or excised." The level of detail is also reduced in describing abuses by Afghanistan, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela, said The Washington Post.
While the Biden administration viewed Israel as an ally, its report had "many more lines in the executive summary on the country's human rights violations during the military strikes that followed the Hamas attacks," said the Times. Referencing El Salvador, Trump's State Department says there are "no credible reports of significant human rights abuses." Prior reports listed "unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture, and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions," said The Guardian.
What next? Many policy officials have "expressed concern that such shifts could signal inconsistencies in what are supposed to be core American values," said the Post. The "muted release of the reports, while Congress is in recess, is notable."
The reports are "very bad for human rights defenders in places like Cuba or China," said The Atlantic. "None of them can now claim that the State Department Human Rights Report has any factual standing." |