The Week The Week
flag of US
US
flag of UK
UK
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Less than $3 per week

Sign in
  • View Profile
  • Sign out
  • The Explainer
  • Talking Points
  • The Week Recommends
  • Newsletters
  • Cartoons
  • From the Magazine
  • The Week Junior
  • More
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Business
    • Health
    • Science
    • Food & Drink
    • Travel
    • Culture
    • History
    • Personal Finance
    • Puzzles
    • Photos
    • The Blend
    • All Categories
  • Newsletter sign up Newsletter
  • The Week's Saturday Wrap
    Inventing an uprising, the ‘prepping’ boom, and Thiel’s hunt for the Antichrist

     
    controversy of the week

    Trump: Can he shape reality in Portland and Chicago?

    President Trump’s self-declared war on “the enemy within” keeps running into the same problem, said David Ignatius in The Washington Post: the enemy’s stubborn refusal to exist. Federal Judge April Perry last week issued a temporary restraining order blocking Trump’s deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, ruling that his claims of widespread rioting and “rebellion” were “unreliable,” and “cannot be aligned” with facts on the ground. That echoed a ruling made days earlier by Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee who blocked the president from sending guards to Portland, Ore., calling his depictions of a “war-ravaged” city “simply untethered to the facts.” While there have been daily protests outside an ICE facility in downtown Portland, the rallies have been overwhelmingly peaceful, with many demonstrators wearing inflatable animal costumes. But never known for his fealty to facts, Trump doubled down, claiming Portland was so riot-torn it doesn’t “even have stores anymore.” It will take the Supreme Court, ultimately, to decide whether Trump has unfettered power to send U.S. troops to U.S. cities, said Alexei Koseff in the San Francisco Chronicle. That will mean tackling thorny issues of state sovereignty and the even weightier question of “who gets to determine reality.”

    Reality is reality, said David French in The New York Times, and it constrains all of us, even presidents. Trump and his outraged defenders argue that no previous president has been blocked from deploying the National Guard and that Trump is entitled to the same “judicial deference.” But previous presidents were responding to actual breakdowns in law and order, such as Southern states’ refusal to integrate schools in the 1960s, and the Los Angeles riots of 1992. Trump, by contrast, is just making things up, using “wildly false statements” to exercise military force in Democratic states and cities. A president who “constantly lies” deserves “no deference at all.”

    There’s nothing made up about the violence in Chicago, said Julie Bosman in The New York Times, but it’s caused by federal agents. ICE and the Border Patrol have drastically ramped up the “intensity” of their immigration raids in recent weeks and are now routinely using “smoke bombs, tear gas, and pepper balls” against residents who protest the arrest of their undocumented neighbors. U.S. citizens are being stopped on the street, thrown to the ground, and detained by agents despite having committed no obvious offense. Meanwhile at the White House, Trump last week chaired an “antifa roundtable,” where MAGA influencers showed off injuries they claim were inflicted by leftist protesters in Portland, said Makena Kelly in Wired. ICE and these “content creators” are engaged in the same project: manufacturing “visual proof” to substantiate Trump’s bogus claims of urban disorder, giving him cause to send in troops.

    The “war on antifa” is both “buffoonish and sinister,” said Paul Waldman in MSNBC.com. Buffoonish because antifa doesn’t actually exist; it’s just a grandiose label claimed by anarchists and troublemakers. But sinister because that nebulousness makes the term “infinitely flexible.” Trump’s plan is to label all and any political dissent “antifa” and deploy resources to crush it, said Jonathan V. Last in The Bulwark. Whether those resources include the National Guard is up to the courts. But Trump knows that if he can “link the ideas of antifa and terrorism in the minds of the public,” then he will have laid the predicate, should he need it in next year’s midterms, for “the mass arrest of dissenters”—or of anyone he wants.

     
     
    VIEWPOINT

    The perils of personal power

    “For better and for worse—mostly worse—we have inaugurated America’s first personalist system of government. Never have the instruments of governing power been bent quite so aggressively to service the ambitions and wishes of the chief executive. The downside to personalist rule is the absence of constraints when those instincts lead him—and us—in the wrong direction. The personal retribution campaign against his enemies is only one. Holding macroeconomic policy hostage to eccentric theories about trade is another. We live now at the intersection of presidential instinct and personal caprice.”

    Gerard Baker in The Wall Street Journal

     
     
    briefing

    Ready for the apocalypse

    As anxiety rises about the state of the world, the ranks of preppers are growing—and changing.

    What exactly is a prepper? 
    It’s anyone who anticipates a calamity resulting in some degree of social collapse, and makes plans—or prepares—to survive independently. Behind that definition lies a gamut that runs from suburbanites with “bugout bags” to survivalists with basements full of firearms, Spam, and canned beans to tech moguls investing in underground bunkers with spa suites. They’re driven by fears of weather catastrophes, nuclear strikes, civil war, mass disease, the coming of Biblical end-times, and anything else that might force citizens to fend for themselves. John Ramey, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and founder of The Prepared—a “rational” website that offers guidance on such matters as bugout bag essentials (first aid kits, lifeboat rations) and the best body armor and survival knives—says only one thing links today’s preppers: They’re “people who are smart enough to be aware of what the world is like...and have the gumption to do something about it.”

    How many preppers are there? 
    More than 20 million. That’s according to Chris Ellis, a U.S. Army colonel and leading researcher into the movement, who analyzed household resiliency data from FEMA. Ellis, who classifies a prepper as someone who could survive independently for 30 days, said the number has roughly doubled since 2017, which tracks with anecdotal reports from the prepper community. The pandemic took things to “a whole new level,” said Roman Zrazhevskiy, who runs a Texas-based survivalist store. Demand surged so much in the first months of Covid that he had to hire seven new employees just to answer emails. It was, he says, “kind of a customer service nightmare.” Subsequent scares and disasters have drawn only more preppers. Carrie Smith, a Montanan in her mid-30s, said the 2023 sighting of a Chinese spy balloon over the U.S. made her realize she “needed to take matters into my own hands.” She and her husband have since bought four generators, three 55-gallon water drums, piles of freeze-dried foods, and guns and tasers. And while the prepper community is growing fast, it’s also rapidly diversifying.

    How is the movement changing? 
    The archetypal prepper is a white, rural, conservative male. But those who study, advise, and market to preppers report that liberals, city dwellers, and people of color are increasingly entering the fold, especially since President Trump’s re-election. Shane Hobel, who teaches survival skills in upstate New York, says his clients now include not just “soldier of fortune” types but women and Democrats—“people who used to make fun of my school.” While some liberal preppers cite climate change as their main driver and the fear that the government will be unable or unwilling to help, others worry that the U.S. could be engulfed by political violence. People understand “that the world as we knew it and counted on it is beginning to cease to be,” said Eric Shonkwiler, who writes the left-wing prepper newsletter When/If. As those fears rise on the Left and Right, a booming industry has emerged to serve the prepping community.

    What is the industry worth? 
    U.S. preppers spent $11 billion on gear in 2023, according to a Finder.com survey, and the market is still expanding. Preppers are snapping up water filtration systems, hand-cranked radios, manually powered grain mills, and pepper spray and other self-defense tools. Costco sells the $100 Readywide Emergency Food Supply, a “curated” 150-serving bucket of freeze-dried and dehydrated foods. Business is up at Preppi, which offers emergency preparedness bags ranging from a $50 basic model to the $4,995 Ultra Advanced bag, which includes a night vision scope, respirator masks, and “luxe comforts” such as Malin+Goetz toiletries. Ron Hubbard, CEO of Atlas Survival Shelters, says fears of unrest since 2020 have tripled sales of his bunkers, which run from $20,000 into the millions. “They think civil war or revolution is coming,” he said of his customers. Others sell space in survivalist communities.

    What do those communities look like? 
    California-based Vivos Group is leasing space in what it calls the world’s “largest survival shelter community,” 575 empty ex-Army concrete bunkers on South Dakota grasslands. In Kansas sits the Survival Condo, a former missile silo converted into a 15-story survival habitat with a movie theater, bar, swimming pool, rock-climbing wall, and units that start at $1.2 million. Then there’s Fortitude Ranch, a collection of eight compounds around the country founded by a retired U.S. Air Force colonel. Over 1,000 members have paid from about $2,000 (which gets you “shared bunk spaces”) to $41,000 to become members, plus annual dues up to $1,550. The compounds are stocked with solar panels, food and medicine, farm animals, and guard dogs. “It’s like the old saying goes,” said a retired CIA officer who has bought in: “When trouble is on the horizon, a wise man takes precautions.”

    Will preppers’ plans actually work? 
    Some experts are skeptical, especially about how lone-wolf survivalists will fare in an actual catastrophe. Shonkwiler cites the example of a lone prepper “in a MAGA hat” who breaks his leg, gets gangrene, and “he’s done. That’s a month into the apocalypse, and all his guns did nothing for him.” He and other lefty preppers say they offer a more realistic vision that emphasizes community and mutual support in the face of disaster. Of course, many dismiss preppers of any ideology as wild-eyed paranoiacs. But Michael Mills, a British social scientist who studies preppers, says amid rising worries of societal breakdown, a growing number of people are rethinking that view. “There is a bigger question floating in the air,” he said. “Are preppers crazy, or is everyone else?”

    Surviving in style 
    As ordinary preppers stock up on freeze-dried meals and first aid kits, their billionaire counterparts are making plans to ride out the apocalypse in luxury. So say builders of shelters for wealthy clients who aim to be ready when, in prepper parlance, SHTF (shit hits the fan). Bunkers are the “new status symbol of the elite,” said Larry Hall of Survival Condo, who builds shelters that might include gyms, pools, libraries, and shooting ranges. Hubbard of Atlas Survival Shelters said a high-end “buying frenzy” erupted in 2023 when it was reported that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s new Hawaii compound included a 5,000-square-foot bunker. That spread pales next to a project being built in the Upper Midwest by Virginia-based firm SAFE. It’s a fortress surrounded by a 30-foot moat skimmed with a flammable liquid “that can transform into a ring of fire” said SAFE head Al Corbi. It also has water cannons that can take down helicopters. For billionaire preppers, Corbi said, “it’s like when you or I buy a car. We want a spare tire in the trunk, right?”

     
     

    Only in America

    A Pennsylvania church is defending a pastor who preached a sermon while brandishing an AR-15-style rifle. In a statement, Dauphin County’s Legacy Faith Church confirmed reports that pastor Phillip Thornton waved the firearm around while preaching, and even pointed it at the congregation. But the church insists the rifle was unloaded and that Thornton’s intentions were wholly benign: namely, to “encourage spiritual violence toward unbelief.”

     
     
    talking points

    Religion: Thiel’s ‘Antichrist’ obsession

    Tech billionaire Peter Thiel wants to alert the world to an overlooked danger, said Nitasha Tiku in The Washington Post: the coming of the Antichrist. In a recent series of “off-the-record” lectures delivered in San Francisco to sold-out crowds, the venture capitalist and GOP megadonor warned that critics of technology, artificial intelligence, and financial innovation are “legionnaires of the Antichrist,” who could usher in the destruction of America “and an era of global totalitarian rule.” The modern version of the biblical Antichrist would be “a Luddite who wants to stop all science, it’s someone like Greta or Eliezer,” he said, referring to Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and AI researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky, who wants to prevent machines from achieving human-level intelligence. By calling for stricter global regulations, he claimed, these activists could help create a singular world government that the Antichrist would then use to control humanity. Thiel is a devout Christian and longtime libertarian; still, his words were striking in their “effort to cast resisting oversight of technology development as a religious battle.” 

    “The Antichrist has long haunted American politics,” said Matthew Avery Sutton in The Guardian. “A protean figure cobbled together from obscure biblical passages,” the demonic supervillain typically grabs the popular imagination during times of “social disruption and geopolitical dread.” Over the years, the tag has been affixed to “New Deal bureaucrats,” Hitler, communists, and Saddam Hussein. But its familiarity makes it no less dangerous. Once you cast your opponents as Satanic agents, compromise becomes “complicity” and “violence begins to look sanctifying.” As an Episcopal priest, “I find Thiel’s warnings heretical,” said Kevin Deal in the San Francisco Standard. In the Bible, the Antichrist represents “a foil to Christ,” not “a tool to sow fear or division.” Thiel is cynically weaponizing “the language of faith” to serve his own ends.

    Thiel seems like “someone desperately trying to disidentify” from his own vast power, said Adrian Daub in The Guardian. This is a man who, with his “fellow Silicon Valley freaks,” mentored Vice President JD Vance and helped return to the White House an unfit president determined to “remake society and the world.” The PayPal and Palantir co-founder funds the companies that “harness your data and determine who gets doxxed, deported, drone-struck.” And he continues to champion the development of AI, despite also admitting that the technology just might kill us all. If Thiel truly wants to identify the shadowy forces that could end humanity, perhaps he should put down the Book of Revelation and take a look in the mirror.

     
     

    It wasn't all bad

    Arjun Malaviya is only 19 but he’s already visited 118 different countries in pursuit of the Guinness World Record for being the youngest person to visit every nation. Malaviya decided he wanted to explore the world after enduring Covid lockdown as a teen. He launched his tour in South Korea, skipping tourist traps and spending time in villages conversing with locals, often via Google Translate. Along the way he’s enjoyed Micronesia’s mud baths and taken in a Madonna concert on Brazil’s beach—all for $22,500. He has two years left to visit the remaining 77 U.N.-­recognized states. “The big thing that I took away,” he said, “is that people are more similar than different.”

     
     
    people

    The Boss and his dad

    Bruce Springsteen was once afraid of his father, and of turning out just like him, said Eric Cortellessa in Time. When Bruce was growing up, Douglas Springsteen flitted between jobs—cabdriver, prison guard, mill worker—drank heavily, and was prone to explosions of anger and long silences. In working-class New Jersey, therapy wasn’t an option. Decades later, Doug would be diagnosed with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. “My father was a tough guy,” said Springsteen, now 76. “He was tough on me when I was young, but fundamentally, underneath, he was a vulnerable, fragile, sweet-hearted, and soulful man.” 

    His bleakest songs were inspired by Doug, he says; the joyous ones, such as “Rosalita” and “Out in the Street,” were inspired by his mother, Adele, who kept the family afloat working as a legal secretary. Doug died in 1998, but not before reckoning with his flaws. Springsteen says that just before his wife, Patti Scialfa, gave birth to their first child in 1990, Doug drove hours to see him in Los Angeles and told him over mid-morning beers, “You’ve been very good to us, and I wasn’t very good to you.” The admission touched Springsteen deeply. “He had the fortitude and the wherewithal and the deep understanding that I was about to become a father, and he didn’t want me to make the same mistakes.”

     
     

    Saturday Wrap was written and edited by Theunis Bates, Chris Erikson, Bill Falk, Mark Gimein, Bruno Maddox, and Hallie Stiller.

    Image credits, from top: Reuters; Reuters; Getty Images; Getty Images
     

    Recent editions

    • Evening Review

      A Tomahawk bluff?

    • Morning Report

      Chicago gets some breathing room

    • Evening Review

      Freedom frogs vs. ICE

    VIEW ALL
    TheWeek
    • About Us
    • Contact Future's experts
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Advertise With Us
    • FAQ

    The Week is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site.

    © Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.