Is Keir Starmer really ‘Captain Hindsight’ on Covid restrictions?
Conservatives accuse Labour leader of ‘playing politics’ over the pandemic response
Keir Starmer is living up to the “Captain Hindsight” nickname handed to him by Boris Johnson by pre-empting the government’s policies with public calls for tighter Covid restrictions, critics claim.
The Labour leader insisted during a television interview on Monday that schools should be shut in order to curb soaring infection rates - a demand that came “an hour after Downing Street had briefed journalists that an announcement was coming that evening”, Politico London Playbook’s Alex Wickham reports.
Starmer’s allies insist the interview was recorded before the policy was briefed, but sceptics argue that the schools call is just the latest example of the Labour chief “playing politics during the pandemic”, says Wickham.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Starmer claimed shortly before Christmas that the new, more infectious strain of Covid had been “spotted in September” but that the prime minister had chosen to “ignore alarm bells”.
But NHS England said that health bosses had only became aware of the variant in mid-October, according to The Sun.
Conservative Party co-chair Amanda Milling, told the newspaper that Starmer was “peddling falsehoods”, adding: “If Captain Hindsight is so sure, let the country know where he got his facts from for this sheer attempt at political opportunism?”
The Telegraph’s Tom Harris, a former Labour MP, agrees that “it’s not the unions whose lead Starmer is following, it’s the prime minister’s”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Pre-announcing whatever Number 10 says is the most risk-free strategy for a party leader who values responsibility and electoral credibility far more than voter-repellent radicalism”, Harris writes. “But the tactic is also cynical, and it’s becoming more transparent every day.”
Both Starmer and his supporters have repeatedly denied that he is simply parroting the government line.
In October, the Labour chief told The Guardian that Johnson had “lost control” of the fight against Covid-19 and said that it was the PM who is “governing in hindsight”. Starmer laid out a five-point plan for handling the pandemic, including putting in place procedures for distributing the vaccine that would be given the green-light two months later.
More recently, Starmer added his voice to the chorus of experts who called for a national lockdown.
Speaking shortly after Johnson acknowledged on Sunday that Covid restrictions were “probably about to get tougher”, Starmer said: “We can’t allow the prime minister to use up the next two or three weeks and then bring in the national lockdown that is inevitable. Do it now. That’s the necessary first step to get the virus back under control.”
Responding to Starmer’s intervention, a No. 10 source said: “We have moved more areas into tier 4 to bear down on the new variant and escalated other areas into tier 3. This targeted approach is the right one.”
On Monday, however, Johnson announced the third national lockdown.
Starmer’s latest intervention is a call for a “round the clock” vaccination programme in order to deliver on the PM’s pledge to inoculate around 13 million people by mid-February.
Whether that will become government policy remains to be seen.
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
The launch of Your Party: how it could workThe Explainer Despite landmark decisions made over the party’s makeup at their first conference, core frustrations are ‘likely to only intensify in the near-future’
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
Will Rachel Reeves’ tax U-turn be disastrous?Today’s Big Question The chancellor scraps income tax rises for a ‘smorgasbord’ of smaller revenue-raising options
-
Will the public buy Rachel Reeves’s tax rises?Today’s Big Question The Chancellor refused to rule out tax increases in her televised address, and is set to reverse pledges made in the election manifesto
-
Five takeaways from Plaid Cymru’s historic Caerphilly by-election winThe Explainer The ‘big beasts’ were ‘humbled’ but there was disappointment for second-placed Reform too
-
The Chinese threat: No. 10’s evidence leads to more questionsTalking Point Keir Starmer is under pressure after collapsed spying trial
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support

