Sunak house protest: is all fair in the fight against climate change?
Action by ‘self-obsessed zealots’ is condemned by some, but do less confrontational tactics work?
Five Greenpeace activists who were arrested after they scaled the roof of Rishi Sunak’s country home have been released on bail less than 24 hours after the protest.
The climate campaigners used ladders and climbing ropes to reach the roof of the manor house in Kirby Sigston, North Yorkshire. They were taking the action, they said, because Sunak has “opened the door to a new drilling frenzy in the North Sea” while “large parts of our world are literally on fire”.
Alicia Kearns, the Tory MP who chairs the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, said the protest was “unacceptable”, and a Tory backbencher went further, telling the Daily Express that he would “shoot them”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the papers say?
“While shoot-to-kill tactics may seem at the more extreme end of tackling the zealots”, said the paper, the incident has “certainly unnerved a few MPs”.
It has also agitated some media outlets. “This whole fiasco is a symbol of our country’s supine tolerance of a tiny, self-obsessed minority of climate zealots who seem able to disrupt the everyday life of the nation with impunity”, said the Daily Mail.
The actions of the Greenpeace activists are “simply unacceptable”, said The Yorkshire Post. The homes of politicians “should remain a safe place, free from intrusion”, as it “doesn’t just impact elected representatives but also their families”. The paper said that “fair-minded people will take a dim view” of the protest.
But is all fair in the fight against climate change? As the tactics of groups like Greenpeace and Just Stop Oil become more direct and confrontational, there has been criticism of activists’ rhetoric from the newly elected head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
“If you constantly communicate the message that we are all doomed to extinction,” said Professor Jim Skea, “that paralyses people and prevents them from taking the necessary steps to get a grip on climate change.”
The veteran campaigner Swampy, who became notorious during the 1990s for his climate protests, told Good Morning Britain that he “wouldn’t do it that way” when he was asked about some of Just Stop Oil’s disruptive tactics.
The campaigner, whose real name is Daniel Hooper, said that protesters who disrupt traffic or sporting events are “obviously brave and passionate”, but change will come from working with people from “different walks of life”.
However, some argue that less confrontational tactics have already been shown not to work.
Despite “decades of lobbying, petitions, marches and civil disobedience”, planet-heating fossil fuel emissions are at an “all-time high”, and the “window to avert further climate catastrophe is closing”, wrote Cara Buckley for The New York Times.
By staging more dramatic protests, such as throwing tomato soup at a Van Gogh painting, activists “nabbed far more attention than anything they’d undertaken yet”, she added.
“Disruptive political activism, from strikes to boycotts to road occupations, always makes enemies,” wrote Andy Beckett in The Guardian last year. “That’s part of the point: confrontations and controversies mean publicity.”
But criticising the climate activists “detracts from what we should be angry about – failure to tackle the most urgent problems of our age”, he added.
What next?
In the wake of the Greenpeace protest in North Yorkshire there have been questions over how the activists were able to reach the roof of the prime minister’s home.
Suella Braverman must launch an inquiry into the security breach at Sunak’s home, said her predecessor, Priti Patel. “It would be sensible for the home secretary to have a full review as to how this very serious security breach has taken place,” said Patel.
Peter Walker, the former deputy chief constable of North Yorkshire, has called for an investigation into his old force, The Times reported. “This time it happens to be Greenpeace – what if it had been a terrorist organisation?” he asked.
The protest will have been watched “with interest” by “more nefarious actors than Greenpeace”, agreed Ian Acheson for CapX. So, even if the protest is viewed as just a “bunch of tree-huggers playing an elaborate prank”, the “serious point” is that “violent terrorists are on the lookout for any weaknesses” in security, he added.
Meanwhile, the Daily Mail has called for the authorities to throw the book at the activists. “In America, they would probably have been shot on sight,” it said, and “in China, they would never have been heard of again”.
“These people compare themselves with the Suffragettes”, the paper said, but “they act more like mobsters”. Targeting the families and private homes of elected politicians is “simply unacceptable” and “the criminals responsible should be subjected to the full force of the law”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
The mental health crisis affecting vets
Under The Radar Death of Hampshire vet highlights mental health issues plaguing the industry
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The Onion is having a very ironic laugh with Infowars
The Explainer The satirical newspaper is purchasing the controversial website out of bankruptcy
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'Rahmbo, back from Japan, will be looking for a job? Really?'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How safe are cruise ships in storms?
The Explainer The vessels are always prepared
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Starmer vs the farmers: who will win?
Today's Big Question As farmers and rural groups descend on Westminster to protest at tax changes, parallels have been drawn with the miners' strike 40 years ago
By The Week UK Published
-
Biden visits Amazon, says climate legacy irreversible
Speed Read Nobody can reverse America's 'clean energy revolution,' said the president, despite the incoming Trump administration's promises to dismantle climate policies
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Climate change is threatening Florida's Key deer
The Explainer Questions remain as to how much effort should be put into saving the animals
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Is Cop29 a 'waste of time'?
Today's Big Question World leaders stay away as spectre of Donald Trump haunts flagship UN climate summit
By The Week UK Published
-
At least 95 dead in Spain flash floods
Speed Read Torrential rainfall caused the country's worst flooding since 1996
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Earth's carbon sinks are collapsing
Under the Radar Forests and soil are not operating as usual
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Why the Earth's water cycle is under threat
Under The Radar Disturbances in the system that moves water around the world place more than half of global food production at risk
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published