‘Equally wooden’: Starmer and Truss do battle in first PMQs
First meeting between the pair seemed to herald a return to the old dividing lines between Conservative and Labour
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The UK’s new prime minister Liz Truss went head to head with Labour leader Keir Starmer as the pair faced each other at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) for the first time.
It was a PMQs dominated by the energy crisis and tax cuts, as Truss ruled out introducing a windfall tax to fund a widely expected freeze on the energy price cap.
Clashing with Starmer, Truss said “we cannot tax our way to growth” as the Labour leader accused the new PM of “making hard-working people pay”, citing Treasury estimates that energy producers will make £170bn in excess profits over the next two years.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Truss propped up by ‘wooden’ Starmer
If Truss was nervous on her first outing at the despatch box as prime minister, “she certainly did not show it”, said The Daily Telegraph, which assessed her performance as “assured” as she “calmly batted away” Starmer’s attack lines.
For Starmer, this “should have been easy”, wrote columnist Alice Thomson for The Times. Truss may have spent a decade at the despatch box honing her debating skills, “but for all her talents, the new prime minister is not a natural speaker”.
Luckily for the new PM, she faced an “equally wooden” performer in Keir Starmer, said Thomson, and managed to exceed the low expectations of many pundits and backbenchers. She even landed her first joke, after having it teed up by former prime minister Theresa May, quipping that not only was it the Tories who had produced three female leaders, but Labour couldn’t even find one “who doesn’t come from north London”.
Back to the ‘old dividing lines’
This week’s debate was certainly “more ideological and more enlightening” than we’ve been used to of late, said Sky News’s political editor Beth Rigby. Unlike the Commons clashes of Boris Johnson’s premiership, where the focus often tipped into trading “rhetorical blows and political attacks”, there seemed to be “genuine differences over policy and ideology”, said Rigby. It was “almost going back to the old dividing lines of the Conservatives versus Labour,” Rigby noted.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
If there is one key takeaway from this week’s PMQs, it is that there is a “thick red dividing line” between Truss’s plan to “borrow [and] add debt to fund an energy package” to contend with the energy crisis, while Starmer would “fund one at least in part with a windfall tax on excess profits”, tweeted Kevin Maguire, the Daily Mirror’s associate editor.
Judging either Truss or Starmer on this first outing is “clearly ridiculous”, said the BBC’s political editor Chris Mason. But it is clear “how different” PMQs is likely to feel going forward, one which will demand a very different approach from Keir Starmer than the one he adopted with Boris Johnson. But in Truss, Starmer now faces “a very different opponent”.
Sorcha Bradley is a writer at The Week and a regular on “The Week Unwrapped” podcast. She worked at The Week magazine for a year and a half before taking up her current role with the digital team, where she mostly covers UK current affairs and politics. Before joining The Week, Sorcha worked at slow-news start-up Tortoise Media. She has also written for Sky News, The Sunday Times, the London Evening Standard and Grazia magazine, among other publications. She has a master’s in newspaper journalism from City, University of London, where she specialised in political journalism.
-
The ‘ravenous’ demand for Cornish mineralsUnder the Radar Growing need for critical minerals to power tech has intensified ‘appetite’ for lithium, which could be a ‘huge boon’ for local economy
-
Why are election experts taking Trump’s midterm threats seriously?IN THE SPOTLIGHT As the president muses about polling place deployments and a centralized electoral system aimed at one-party control, lawmakers are taking this administration at its word
-
‘Restaurateurs have become millionaires’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
Will Peter Mandelson and Andrew testify to US Congress?Today's Big Question Could political pressure overcome legal obstacles and force either man to give evidence over their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?
-
How long can Keir Starmer last as Labour leader?Today's Big Question Pathway to a coup ‘still unclear’ even as potential challengers begin manoeuvring into position
-
What is at stake for Starmer in China?Today’s Big Question The British PM will have to ‘play it tough’ to achieve ‘substantive’ outcomes, while China looks to draw Britain away from US influence
-
Can Starmer continue to walk the Trump tightrope?Today's Big Question PM condemns US tariff threat but is less confrontational than some European allies
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Alaa Abd el-Fattah: should Egyptian dissident be stripped of UK citizenship?Today's Big Question Resurfaced social media posts appear to show the democracy activist calling for the killing of Zionists and police
-
Is Keir Starmer being hoodwinked by China?Today's Big Question PM’s attempt to separate politics and security from trade and business is ‘naïve’