Calling for America’s highest-ranking military officer to resign is not something one does lightly, said David Mastio in USA Today. But it’s hard to see how Gen. Mark Milley can remain as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) if there’s any truth to the allegations contained in Peril, the new book by journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. According to them, Milley was so worried that President Trump might start a war with China during his last months in office that he twice contacted his opposite number in Beijing to offer them assurances. “If we’re going to attack,” Milley apparently told Gen. Li Zuocheng, “I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.” It seems Milley also “prepared his senior officers to slow-walk any orders from Trump to use nuclear weapons”. On the face of it, these are blatant attempts to override civilian control of the military.
As for claims that Milley interfered with Trump’s power to launch nukes, these too are exaggerated, said Fred Kaplan on Slate. When the general summoned senior officials to review the procedures for a nuclear launch, he acknowledged that only the president could give the order; he just stressed the fact that protocol required the chair of the JCS to at least be consulted first. This is very different from what happened in 1974, when the then-JCS chair George Brown told top military commanders that they were not to carry out any “execute orders” from the drunken, unstable President Nixon unless he and the defence secretary first verified the order. “Now that was an act of genuine insubordination” – albeit one justified in the circumstances. The underlying problem here is that US presidents are entrusted with absolute power “to blow up the planet”. That’s what needs to change.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Who is fuelling the flames of antisemitism in Australia?Today’s Big Question Deadly Bondi Beach attack the result of ‘permissive environment’ where warning signs were ‘too often left unchecked’
-
Bulgaria is the latest government to fall amid mass protestsThe Explainer The country’s prime minister resigned as part of the fallout
-
Sudoku hard: December 15, 2025The daily hard sudoku puzzle from The Week
-
Trump: Losing energy and supportFeature Polls show that only one of his major initiatives—securing the border—enjoys broad public support
-
Trump’s poll collapse: can he stop the slide?Talking Point President who promised to ease cost-of-living has found that US economic woes can’t be solved ‘via executive fiat’
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
-
The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?Talking Point With the Saudis investing $1 trillion into the US, and Trump granting them ‘major non-Nato ally’ status, for now the two countries need each other
-
Nigel Farage: was he a teenage racist?Talking Point Farage’s denials have been ‘slippery’, but should claims from Reform leader’s schooldays be on the news agenda?
-
Tariffs: Will Trump’s reversal lower prices?Feature Retailers may not pass on the savings from tariff reductions to consumers
