1% deposit mortgages: a good option for first-time buyers?
Reported plan by the Treasury to reintroduce a low-deposit scheme has split opinion

The government is reportedly considering introducing 99% loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages in a bid to support first-time buyers and boost the property market.
According to The Independent, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is mulling the "bold plan" to announce 1% deposit mortgages in his Spring Budget in March, as the Conservatives seek to "give young people a reason to vote Tory".
Housing is expected to become one of the "major battlegrounds" in the run-up to the next general election, which is likely to take place this autumn, said The Guardian's banking correspondent Kalyeena Makortoff. But while a 1% deposit mortgage would "undoubtedly" help some of "Generation Rent" get on the housing ladder, ministers are being warned of the potential risks and consequences of "pushing" more buyers into the property market.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How would 1% deposit mortgages work?
The government might offer "financial guarantees" for banks, said This is Money, to "encourage them to hand out mortgages" covering 99% of a property's value.
If approved, said The Guardian's Makortoff, the scheme would "go even further" than the now defunct Help to Buy scheme, which required a 5% deposit to purchase a new-build.
Rather than having to save "tens of thousands", said The Independent, 1% deposits could "make the home ownership dream a reality" with far less cash. The average house price is £284,950, according to the Land Registry, so a first-time buyer would need £2,843.50 under such a scheme.
Are 1% deposit mortgages a good idea?
Although a 99% mortgage would help "address the issue of finding money for a deposit", said The Independent, it wouldn't "magically secure" the future for young people. Lenders would probably charge higher interest rates to compensate for the greater level of risk, and house prices are "still high".
And mortgage brokers have warned that the "high-stakes gamble" could fuel a house price bubble that made home ownership even more unaffordable for future would-be buyers. Peter Stamford, the founder of Moor Mortgages, told The Intermediary that the initiative could "cause the property market to overheat, driving prices up further".
A growing number of borrowers could then be left in negative equity – when the value of the property falls below the size of the loan.
Brokers have warned that borrowers could face "unmanageable debts similar to those still carried by some buyers who were offered 100%-plus mortgages", which were worth more than the value of the home, during the 2008 financial crash, The Guardian's Makortoff reported.
High LTV mortgages are already a "niche" product, said Zoopla's research director Richard Donnell, and "the reality is that many first-time buyers do not want to put down just 1% or 2%".
The “challenge" with small deposit schemes is that affordability testing will "still likely apply”, added Donnell, and borrowers would need to be on a "very high income" to afford a London home with a 5% deposit and the subsequent mortgage repayments. Even at 1%, many would still struggle, especially if house prices rose further.
Rather than another government-backed mortgage scheme, suggested Donnell, "building more homes for sale and rent" could keep house prices and rents in check, helping first-time buyers to save for a deposit while improving choice for all.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Marc Shoffman is an NCTJ-qualified award-winning freelance journalist, specialising in business, property and personal finance. He has a BA in multimedia journalism from Bournemouth University and a master’s in financial journalism from City University, London. His career began at FT Business trade publication Financial Adviser, during the 2008 banking crash. In 2013, he moved to MailOnline’s personal finance section This is Money, where he covered topics ranging from mortgages and pensions to investments and even a bit of Bitcoin. Since going freelance in 2016, his work has appeared in MoneyWeek, The Times, The Mail on Sunday and on the i news site.
-
Aston Martin Vantage Roadster: 'a rare treat indeed'
The Week Recommends The Roadster version of Aston Martin's new Vantage coupé makes even 'the most mundane journey feel special'
-
Bad Friend: Tiffany Watt Smith explores why women abandon friendships
The Week Recommends A 'deeply researched' account of female friendship through history
-
Brazil's reborn dolls craze
Under The Radar The 'hyper-realistic' babies soaring in popularity in South American nation have spawned controversy
-
Withdrawing 529 plan funds for college? Here's what to know.
the explainer Maximize the amount you have stashed away for your education
-
US credit rating: what it is and why it matters
the explainer Credit rating agency Moody's downgraded the US last month
-
What to know before 'buying the dip'
the explainer Purchasing a stock once it has fallen in value can pay off — or cost you big
-
Is it worth appealing your property tax assessment?
The Explainer What to do if your property tax bill seems too high
-
3 tips for coping with financial stress
The explainer Feel more at peace in an unpredictable economy
-
4 ways to brush up on your personal finance knowledge
The Explainer It's never too late to improve your financial literacy
-
Should you buy before tariffs hit?
the explainer Panic purchasing may not be in your best interest
-
How can you find a financial adviser you trust?
the explainer Four ways to detect professionals who will act in your best interest