1% deposit mortgages: a good option for first-time buyers?
Reported plan by the Treasury to reintroduce a low-deposit scheme has split opinion

The government is reportedly considering introducing 99% loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages in a bid to support first-time buyers and boost the property market.
According to The Independent, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is mulling the "bold plan" to announce 1% deposit mortgages in his Spring Budget in March, as the Conservatives seek to "give young people a reason to vote Tory".
Housing is expected to become one of the "major battlegrounds" in the run-up to the next general election, which is likely to take place this autumn, said The Guardian's banking correspondent Kalyeena Makortoff. But while a 1% deposit mortgage would "undoubtedly" help some of "Generation Rent" get on the housing ladder, ministers are being warned of the potential risks and consequences of "pushing" more buyers into the property market.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
How would 1% deposit mortgages work?
The government might offer "financial guarantees" for banks, said This is Money, to "encourage them to hand out mortgages" covering 99% of a property's value.
If approved, said The Guardian's Makortoff, the scheme would "go even further" than the now defunct Help to Buy scheme, which required a 5% deposit to purchase a new-build.
Rather than having to save "tens of thousands", said The Independent, 1% deposits could "make the home ownership dream a reality" with far less cash. The average house price is £284,950, according to the Land Registry, so a first-time buyer would need £2,843.50 under such a scheme.
Are 1% deposit mortgages a good idea?
Although a 99% mortgage would help "address the issue of finding money for a deposit", said The Independent, it wouldn't "magically secure" the future for young people. Lenders would probably charge higher interest rates to compensate for the greater level of risk, and house prices are "still high".
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
And mortgage brokers have warned that the "high-stakes gamble" could fuel a house price bubble that made home ownership even more unaffordable for future would-be buyers. Peter Stamford, the founder of Moor Mortgages, told The Intermediary that the initiative could "cause the property market to overheat, driving prices up further".
A growing number of borrowers could then be left in negative equity – when the value of the property falls below the size of the loan.
Brokers have warned that borrowers could face "unmanageable debts similar to those still carried by some buyers who were offered 100%-plus mortgages", which were worth more than the value of the home, during the 2008 financial crash, The Guardian's Makortoff reported.
High LTV mortgages are already a "niche" product, said Zoopla's research director Richard Donnell, and "the reality is that many first-time buyers do not want to put down just 1% or 2%".
The “challenge" with small deposit schemes is that affordability testing will "still likely apply”, added Donnell, and borrowers would need to be on a "very high income" to afford a London home with a 5% deposit and the subsequent mortgage repayments. Even at 1%, many would still struggle, especially if house prices rose further.
Rather than another government-backed mortgage scheme, suggested Donnell, "building more homes for sale and rent" could keep house prices and rents in check, helping first-time buyers to save for a deposit while improving choice for all.
Marc Shoffman is an NCTJ-qualified award-winning freelance journalist, specialising in business, property and personal finance. He has a BA in multimedia journalism from Bournemouth University and a master’s in financial journalism from City University, London. His career began at FT Business trade publication Financial Adviser, during the 2008 banking crash. In 2013, he moved to MailOnline’s personal finance section This is Money, where he covered topics ranging from mortgages and pensions to investments and even a bit of Bitcoin. Since going freelance in 2016, his work has appeared in MoneyWeek, The Times, The Mail on Sunday and on the i news site.
-
October 19 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Sunday's editorial cartoons include Pete Hegseth and the press, an absence of government, and George Washington crossing the Delaware
-
A little-visited Indian Ocean archipelago
The Week Recommends The paradise of the Union of the Comoros features beautiful beaches, colourful coral reefs and lush forests
-
AI: is the bubble about to burst?
In the Spotlight Stock market ever-more reliant on tech stocks whose value relies on assumptions of continued growth and easy financing
-
5 side hustle ideas to supplement your budget
the explainer Almost two-thirds of Americans are looking to get a second job in the next year
-
How to save on tickets to concerts and other events
The Explainer See your favorite artist without breaking the bank
-
What is day trading and how risky is it?
the explainer It may be exciting, but the odds are long and the risks high
-
When should you use a personal loan vs. a credit card?
The Explainer Determine whether you need a lump sum upfront or a borrowing limit
-
How will Fed rate cuts affect the housing market?
the explainer An anticipated series of Federal Reserve cuts could impact mortgage rates
-
What to know about investing in ETFs
The Explainer Exchange-traded funds can be a great choice for beginners
-
How to ditch ‘buy now, pay later’ debt
the explainer Recent changes mean BNPL will soon affect your credit score
-
Is duty-free shopping worth it?
the explainer How to determine whether you are actually getting a good deal