How political campaign emails fan the flames of the misinformation fire


Facebook and Twitter might get all the flack, but a new investigation by The New York Times reveals how easily and relatively covertly misinformation circulates within politicians' campaign emails, one of "the most powerful communication tools" at their disposal and one much less monitored than other online correspondence.
Where possible, the Times signed up for the campaign lists of the 390 senators and representatives running for re-election and 2022, and analyzed over 2,500 emails "to track how widely false and misleading statements were being used to help fill political coffers." What they found was that "both parties delivered heaps of hyperbole in their emails," though Republicans were worse offenders than Democrats; GOP lawmakers included misinformation in about 15 percent of their messages, versus just 2 percent of Democrats. Furthermore, the Times reports, "multiple Republicans often spread the same unfounded claims, whereas Democrats rarely repeated one another's."
For example, at least eight Republican lawmakers sent fundraising emails inaccurately describing a potential settlement "with migrants separated from their families during the Trump administration." One lawmaker, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), even claimed President Biden was "giving every illegal immigrant that comes into our country $450,000."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On the Democratic side, false statements were mostly about abortion. In one instance, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) wrote in an email that the Mississippi abortion law currently before the Supreme Court is "nearly identical" to the one in Texas, though such a statement is inaccurate. A Maloney spokesperson said the error was a "honest mistake."
"It may be a fund-raising pitch, but very often people look at it as a campaign pitch," said Republican pollster Frank Luntz of distorted emails. "And so misleading them in an attempt to divide them from their money is pure evil, because you're taking advantage of people who just don't know the difference."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Brigid Kennedy worked at The Week from 2021 to 2023 as a staff writer, junior editor and then story editor, with an interest in U.S. politics, the economy and the music industry.
-
Elon Musk departs Trump administration
speed read The former DOGE head says he is ending his government work to spend more time on his companies
-
Trump taps ex-personal lawyer for appeals court
speed read The president has nominated Emil Bove, his former criminal defense lawyer, to be a federal judge
-
US trade court nullifies Trump's biggest tariffs
speed read The US Court of International Trade says Trump exceeded his authority in imposing global tariffs
-
Trump pauses all new foreign student visas
speed read The State Department has stopped scheduling interviews with those seeking student visas in preparation for scrutiny of applicants' social media
-
Trump pardons Virginia sheriff convicted of bribery
speed read Former sheriff Scott Jenkins was sentenced to 10 years in prison on federal bribery and fraud charges
-
Germany lifts Kyiv missile limits as Trump, Putin spar
speed read Russia's biggest drone and missile attacks of the war prompted Trump to post that Putin 'has gone absolutely CRAZY!'
-
Tied Supreme Court blocks church charter school
speed read The court upheld the Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision to bar overtly religious public charter schools
-
GOP megabill would limit judicial oversight of Trump
speed read The domestic policy bill Republicans pushed through the House would protect the Trump administration from the consequences of violating court orders