President Trump can “add another check mark to his enemies list,” said Steve Benen in MSNBC.com. John Bolton, a former Trump national security adviser turned Trump critic, was indicted by a grand jury on charges of mishandling classified information. Coming on the heels of charges against former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, the Bolton case can be seen as another example of the Justice Department “being weaponized” against a Trump foe. Still, there’s “a qualitative difference” between those indictments and Bolton’s, namely that his contains “credible evidence of alleged wrongdoing.” Prosecutors said that as a Trump adviser in 2018 and ’19, Bolton used his personal email to share “diary” notes containing classified information with his wife and daughter. None of that classified material appeared in Bolton’s 2020 memoir, an unflattering portrait of Trump’s chaotic first administration. But it was apparently read by Iranian hackers. Bolton, who alerted the FBI to the hack, denies any wrongdoing and has called the charges part of Trump’s “effort to intimidate his opponents.”
The prosecution’s case looks strong, “but the president’s conduct inevitably casts a cloud over the charges,” said The Washington Post in an editorial. Trump has never forgiven Bolton for publishing his salacious tell-all memoir or for calling him “unfit to be president.” So it wouldn’t be surprising if Trump personally ordered the prosecution of a man he once called a “traitor” and a “low-life who should be in jail.” Bolton is undeniably a victim of “lawfare,” said Andrew C. McCarthy in National Review. Under a previous administration, it’s likely his case would not have been charged— as happened with Hillary Clinton and President Joe Biden when they were accused of mishandling classified information. But “lawfare and real misconduct are not mutually exclusive,” and if the allegations in the indictment are found to be true, Bolton, 76, could face years in prison.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
-
Elizabeth Gilbert chooses books about women overcoming difficultyThe Week Recommends The bestselling author shares works by Tove Jansson, Lauren Groff and Rayya Elias
-
Turner & Constable: Rivals & Originals – a ‘thrilling’ exhibitionThe Week Recommends Celebration of two of the UK’s ‘greatest landscape painters’ at Tate Britain is a truly ‘absorbing’ experience
-
Political cartoons for December 5Cartoons Friday’s political cartoons include DOJ censorship, bombing the New York Times, and more
-
The military: When is an order illegal?Feature Trump is making the military’s ‘most senior leaders complicit in his unlawful acts’
-
Ukraine and Rubio rewrite Russia’s peace planFeature The only explanation for this confusing series of events is that ‘rival factions’ within the White House fought over the peace plan ‘and made a mess of it’
-
The US-Saudi relationship: too big to fail?Talking Point With the Saudis investing $1 trillion into the US, and Trump granting them ‘major non-Nato ally’ status, for now the two countries need each other
-
Nigel Farage: was he a teenage racist?Talking Point Farage’s denials have been ‘slippery’, but should claims from Reform leader’s schooldays be on the news agenda?
-
Tariffs: Will Trump’s reversal lower prices?Feature Retailers may not pass on the savings from tariff reductions to consumers
-
American antisemitismFeature The world’s oldest hatred is on the rise in U.S. Why?
-
Trump: Is he losing control of MAGA?Feature We may be seeing the ‘first meaningful right-wing rebellion against autocracy of this era’
-
US government shutdown: why the Democrats ‘caved’In the Spotlight The recent stalemate in Congress could soon be ‘overshadowed by more enduring public perceptions’
