US trade court nullifies Trump's biggest tariffs
The US Court of International Trade says Trump exceeded his authority in imposing global tariffs
What happened
The federal U.S. Court of International Trade Wednesday struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs against other countries. The bipartisan three-judge panel unanimously invalidated Trump's fentanyl-related and "Liberation Day" tariffs, and any other import taxes based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. His tariffs on steel, aluminum, cars and other specific industries, levied under a different law, are not affected by the ruling.
Who said what
The 1977 law "does not authorize the president to impose unbounded tariffs," the court said, and Trump's import taxes "exceed any authority granted" him by the law. The judges also agreed with the two sets of plaintiffs — a group of small businesses and 12 states — that trade deficits do not constitute an "unusual and extraordinary threat." No president had previously "sought to invoke" the emergency act "to impose tariffs on other nations," The New York Times said. The law "does not even mention tariffs."
"This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can't be made on the president's whim," said Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who led the states' lawsuit. The decision "blows a giant hole through Trump's strategy to use steep tariffs to wring concessions from trading partners," Reuters said. That "may be a very dandy plan," Senior Judge Jane Restani, a Ronald Reagan appointee, said in oral arguments, "but it has to meet the statute."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Wall Street cheered the decision, with the dollar strengthening and Asian markets and U.S. stock futures rising after it was handed down Wednesday evening. The White House immediately filed a notice of appeal. "It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency," spokesperson Kash Patel said in a statement.
What next?
The New York-based trade court gave the Trump administration 10 days to order a halt to the tariffs. The government may also "have to pay back duties it has already collected," Politico said. The ruling can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit — a specialized court that deals largely with patent and trademark law — and ultimately to the Supreme Court.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
A peek inside Europe’s luxury new sleeper busThe Week Recommends Overnight service with stops across Switzerland and the Netherlands promises a comfortable no-fly adventure
-
Space data centers could be joining the orbitUnder the radar The AI revolution is going cosmic
-
Codeword: December 23, 2025The daily codeword puzzle from The Week
-
The MAGA civil war takes center stage at the Turning Point USA conferenceIN THE SPOTLIGHT ‘Americafest 2025’ was a who’s who of right-wing heavyweights eager to settle scores and lay claim to the future of MAGA
-
CBS pulls ‘60 Minutes’ report on Trump deporteesSpeed Read An investigation into the deportations of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s notorious prison was scrapped
-
Trump administration posts sliver of Epstein filesSpeed Read Many of the Justice Department documents were heavily redacted, though new photos of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton emerged
-
Is Trump deliberately redacting Epstein files to shield himself?Today’s Big Question Removal of image from publicly released documents prompts accusations of political interference by justice department
-
What Nick Fuentes and the Groypers wantThe Explainer White supremacism has a new face in the US: a clean-cut 27-year-old with a vast social media following
-
Trump HHS moves to end care for trans youthSpeed Read The administration is making sweeping proposals that would eliminate gender-affirming care for Americans under age 18
-
Why does Trump want to reclassify marijuana?Today's Big Question Nearly two-thirds of Americans want legalization
-
Jack Smith tells House of ‘proof’ of Trump’s crimesSpeed Read President Donald Trump ‘engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election,’ hoarded classified documents and ‘repeatedly tried to obstruct justice’
