US trade court nullifies Trump's biggest tariffs
The US Court of International Trade says Trump exceeded his authority in imposing global tariffs
What happened
The federal U.S. Court of International Trade Wednesday struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs against other countries. The bipartisan three-judge panel unanimously invalidated Trump's fentanyl-related and "Liberation Day" tariffs, and any other import taxes based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. His tariffs on steel, aluminum, cars and other specific industries, levied under a different law, are not affected by the ruling.
Who said what
The 1977 law "does not authorize the president to impose unbounded tariffs," the court said, and Trump's import taxes "exceed any authority granted" him by the law. The judges also agreed with the two sets of plaintiffs — a group of small businesses and 12 states — that trade deficits do not constitute an "unusual and extraordinary threat." No president had previously "sought to invoke" the emergency act "to impose tariffs on other nations," The New York Times said. The law "does not even mention tariffs."
"This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can't be made on the president's whim," said Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who led the states' lawsuit. The decision "blows a giant hole through Trump's strategy to use steep tariffs to wring concessions from trading partners," Reuters said. That "may be a very dandy plan," Senior Judge Jane Restani, a Ronald Reagan appointee, said in oral arguments, "but it has to meet the statute."
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Wall Street cheered the decision, with the dollar strengthening and Asian markets and U.S. stock futures rising after it was handed down Wednesday evening. The White House immediately filed a notice of appeal. "It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency," spokesperson Kash Patel said in a statement.
What next?
The New York-based trade court gave the Trump administration 10 days to order a halt to the tariffs. The government may also "have to pay back duties it has already collected," Politico said. The ruling can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit — a specialized court that deals largely with patent and trademark law — and ultimately to the Supreme Court.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Taps could run dry in drought-stricken TehranUnder the Radar President warns that unless rationing eases water crisis, citizens may have to evacuate the capital
-
Alaska faces earth-shaking loss as seismic monitoring stations shutterIN THE SPOTLIGHT NOAA cuts have left the western seaboard without a crucial resource to measure, understand and predict tsunamis
-
10 great advent calendars for everyone (including the dog)The Week Recommends Countdown with cocktails, jams and Legos
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Supreme Court to decide on mail-in ballot limitsSpeed Read The court will determine whether states can count mail-in ballots received after Election Day
-
Democrats split as Senate votes to end shutdownSpeed Read The proposed deal does not extend Affordable Care Act subsidies, the Democrats’ main demand
-
USDA orders states to ‘undo’ full SNAP paymentsSpeed Read The Trump administration is telling states not to pay full November food stamp benefits
-
Senate takes first step to end record shutdownSpeed Read Eight senators in the Democratic caucus voted with Republicans to advance legislation to reopen the government
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
