Antisemitism on campus: free speech and double standards
Politicians have rebuked statements made by presidents of Harvard, University of Pennsylvania and MIT
Should university students be allowed to call for the genocide of Jews? The answer to that would be obvious to most people, said Noah Rothman in National Review. But not, it seems, to the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and MIT.
The three women appeared at a congressional hearing last week, where they were each asked whether such calls violated their schools' policies. None of them could give a straight answer. "It depends on the context," said Harvard's Claudine Gay. Their mealy-mouthed responses showed why the "antisemitic agitation" that has exploded on US campuses since 7 October has not been shut down.
These responses drew rebukes from politicians of both parties. "It's unbelievable that this needs to be said," declared a White House spokesperson. "Calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country."
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'Violating free speech'
The clips from the hearing look terrible, said Michelle Goldberg in The New York Times. Watch the whole thing, though, and it's clear that they were answering questions related to slogans such as "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and chants about "intifada".
Abhorrent as some may find these, "their meaning is contested in a way that, say, 'Gas the Jews' is not". For universities to commit to disciplining those who use them would be "an egregious violation of free speech".
'Double standards'
These expressions clearly enjoy First Amendment protection, agreed Jason Willick in The Washington Post – as, incidentally, does racist and sexist speech. The real issue here is double standards. University leaders would be on stronger ground if their institutions weren't so intolerant towards views that don't conform to progressive ideology.
Campuses have become hostile places these days for those who stray from the approved line on gender or diversity. The political climate is even more oppressive now than during the McCarthy era. Around 100 professors were fired for their beliefs over a ten-year period of the "Red Scare", whereas in the past nine years the equivalent figure has been closer to 200.
Universities must decide, said Bret Stephens in The New York Times: if they're seriously committed to free speech – which they should be – that "must go for all controversial views", including ones they don't like. The days of "having it both ways, at the expense of Jews, must come to an end now".
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
What are Trump's plans for public health?
Today's Big Question From abortion access to vaccine mandates
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
GOP's Mace seeks federal anti-trans bathroom ban
Speed Read Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina has introduced legislation to ban transgender people from using federal facilities
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
US charges Indian tycoon with bribery, fraud
Speed Read Indian billionaire Gautam Adani has been indicted by US prosecutors for his role in a $265 million scheme to secure solar energy deals
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published