Is 'from the river to the sea' antisemitic or just pro-Palestinian?
The fight over a slogan blows up in Congress, in the UK parliament and on college campuses


Amid fierce fighting in Gaza, some pro-Palestinian activists have given new prominence to an old motto: “From the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free.” Israel’s defenders say the phrase is antisemitic, while critics like Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) say it’s a “call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence.” Most of Tlaib’s colleagues disagree: This week they censured her, citing her use of the slogan as one reason for the rebuke.
It’s not just Congress. The White House also condemned Tlaib’s phrasing, according to The New York Times. And it’s not just a Washington thing. A conference for the Society of Ethnomusicology was disrupted after the slogan was displayed during a lecture, noted Inside Higher Ed. “It was traumatizing to read a slogan that Hamas has adopted as a rallying cry for the destruction of the Jewish State,” the society said in an apology statement. The controversy is global: Israel’s i24 News reported that Berlin has criminalized the slogan, saying it violates German law and negates Israel’s existence. In the U.K., a member of Parliament was suspended for using the phrase at a rally.
“In this chaotic environment” it’s hard to know which slogans “express legitimate points of view and which convey bigotry,” Eric Levitz wrote for New York. Rather than try to suss out the motivations of speakers, he wrote, it’s better to focus on the plain meaning of the words. “Some speech acts inherently devalue Jewish life. Others don’t.” That doesn’t necessarily bring much clarity to the debates over “from the river to the sea.” It’s one of the “most contentious” debates going.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
'The elimination of the Jewish state'
For Israel and its defenders, there’s no ambiguity. The phrase “calls for the establishment of a State of Palestine from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, erasing the State of Israel and its people,” the American Jewish Committee said in an explainer. While there’s nothing antisemitic about advocating for a Palestinian state, “calling for the elimination of the Jewish state” fits the bill. For Philip Klein at National Review, that makes “from the river to the sea” plainly antisemitic: “The only way you can eliminate Israel and turn that whole area into Palestine is by killing millions of Jews.”
There’s a different way to read it, Ben Burgis argued at Jacobin. The phrase predates Hamas, and it is used by advocates for a “single democratic state with equal rights for Israeli Jews, Palestinian Muslims and Christians … and everyone else who lives there.” That’s a call to extend citizenship to everybody living within the borders controlled by Israel. Tlaib has made it clear that’s how she uses the phrase. Still, Burgis wrote, “you can argue it’s tactically unwise to use a slogan that can be misinterpreted” as having genocidal intent.
There is also a question of the audience. “It’s important to remember this chant is in English and it doesn’t rhyme in Arabic,” Nimer Sultany, a lecturer at London’s School of Oriental and African Studies, told Al Jazeera. The chant, he said, is used mainly in demonstrations in Western countries.
A 'hatred of all Jews'?
“What the phrase means depends on who is telling the story — and which audience is hearing it,” Laurie Kellman wrote at The Associated Press. One thing to note: The slogan has been adopted by Hamas in its violent “drive to claim land spanning Israel.” After the murderous Oct. 7 attacks, it’s difficult for many listeners to take the phrase as anything less than malicious. “No one can now say that in the eyes of Hamas, a hatred of Israel does not mean a hatred of all Jews,” said one London resident.
If the chanter has a well-known “vision of equality and mutual liberation” then it probably won’t seem as threatening, writer and activist Peter Beinart, who is Jewish, told The New York Times. But if “it’s coming from an armed Hamas member, then yes, I would feel threatened.” As long as the war continues — along with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that sparked it — the two sides might keep talking past each other.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
July 19 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Saturday’s political cartoons include a Medicaid time bomb, and Donald Trump's fixation with the Fed's Jerome Powell
-
5 hilariously cutting cartoons about the Department of Education
Cartoons Artists take on being rotten to the core, budget cuts, and more
-
Kartoffelsalat (potato salad) recipe
The Week Recommends German dish is fresh, creamy and an ideal summer meal
-
'Trump's authoritarian manipulation of language'
Instant Opinion Vienna has become a 'convenient target for populists' | Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Iran: Is regime change possible?
Feature The U.S.-Israeli attack exposed cracks in Iran's regime
-
'There are compelling arguments for and against homework'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Bibi's back: what will Netanyahu do next?
Today's Big Question Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel's PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election
-
US assessing bomb damage to Iran nuclear sites
Speed Read Trump claims this weekend's US bombing obliterated Tehran's nuclear program, while JD Vance insists the US is 'not at war with Iran'
-
Will Iranians revolt?
Talking Point The chasm between Iran's rulers and their subjects is 'as great now as it was when Iranians toppled the Shah'
-
Can MAGA survive a US war on Iran?
Talking Points Trump's wavering sparks debate about 'America First'