How did Qatar become the world's peacemaker?
Strong relationships, ideological pragmatism and neutral positioning has made the tiny Gulf state 'the diplomatic capital of the world'

The latest round of ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas faltered last week, but when both sides return to the table, it will once again be a table in Qatar.
Doha, the Qatari capital, has usurped the mediator role historically played by Washington in the Israel-Palestine conflict. The Gulf state's success in brokering an initial Gaza ceasefire in January "was the product of more than a decade of Qatari efforts to position itself as the Middle East's indispensable go-between", said Bloomberg.
Qatar is "a small nation in a volatile region, surrounded by swaggering players such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Iran", said The Guardian. "To shore up its fragile position", it has quietly "made itself into the diplomatic capital of the world".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
In diplomacy "relationships are key", said DW, "and Qatar is known for its wide and varied network of contacts". It has an ideological flexibility that has seen it simultaneously maintain close relationships with Israel, Hamas, the US and Iran.
In the past, it has funded or otherwise lent support to regional groups with conflicting agendas: from the Taliban in Afghanistan to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt to Libyan militias and anti-government revolutionaries in Syria, Tunisia and Yemen.
While it has worked with closely with the US, "Qatar has also been more pragmatic about Islamist organisations in the region, seeing these as part of popular political movements that cannot be erased or avoided". Qatar's success as a mediator ultimately "stems from its neutral positioning, lack of historical baggage with many parties, and willingness to engage with groups like Hamas, the Taliban and Western powers simultaneously", Abdulaziz Al-Anjari, from the Kuwait-based Reconnaissance Research, told Bloomberg.
The country's enormous resources give it crucial financial clout and independence, while its dynastic power structure enables its small team of negotiators – which includes senior members of the ruling Al Thani family – to make quick, unilateral decisions.
Those negotiators have built up a wealth of experience over the past decade and can point to tangible successes, including the release of Americans held in Iran, Afghanistan and Venezuela. While its primary focus remains on the Middle East, it recently oversaw talks aimed at ending the decades-long fighting between Congo and Rwanda-backed M23 rebels. It has also negotiated diplomatic breakthroughs between Sudan and Chad, and Eritrea and Djibouti.
What next?
Having "enhanced its reputation as an international mediator", Qatar has set about "considering which other conflicts they could help resolve", said Bloomberg. In a "soft-power play" backed by a $510 billion sovereign wealth fund, the country is currently "involved as a mediator in more than 10 other ongoing cases of various natures".
"The rewards Qatar seeks from this work are not immediate, tangible ones," said The Guardian. "They're not looking for investment opportunities, access to raw materials or a say in what happens after a deal is agreed" but rather "to be recognised as a player".
This is perhaps what makes them so attractive and effective as mediators. "The fruits of the brokering – building status and trust, which in turn deepen international influence and relationships – are the prize."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Does depopulation threaten humanity?
Talking Points Falling birth rates could create a 'smaller, sadder, poorer future'
-
New White House guidance means federal employees could be hearing more religious talk at work
The Explainer Employees can now try to persuade co-workers of why their religion is 'correct'
-
Real-life couples creating real-deal sparks in the best movies to star IRL partners
The Week Recommends The chemistry between off-screen items can work wonders
-
Can Gaza aid drops work?
Today's Big Question UN's Palestinian refugee agency calls plan a 'distraction and smokescreen' as pressure mounts on Israel to agree ceasefire and fully open land crossings
-
Iran: Is regime change possible?
Feature The U.S.-Israeli attack exposed cracks in Iran's regime
-
'We know these services are needed'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
'There are compelling arguments for and against homework'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump's strikes on Iran: a 'spectacular success'?
In Depth Military humiliations 'expose the brittleness' of Tehran's ageing regime, but risk reinforcing its commitment to its nuclear program
-
Bibi's back: what will Netanyahu do next?
Today's Big Question Riding high after a series of military victories, Israel's PM could push for peace in Gaza – or secure his own position with snap election
-
US assessing bomb damage to Iran nuclear sites
Speed Read Trump claims this weekend's US bombing obliterated Tehran's nuclear program, while JD Vance insists the US is 'not at war with Iran'
-
Will Iranians revolt?
Talking Point The chasm between Iran's rulers and their subjects is 'as great now as it was when Iranians toppled the Shah'